Skip to content Skip to footer
|

Is Marijuana Destroying California’s Water and Wildlife?

While legal medical marijuana is good for the pro-marijuana crowd, it’s not as good for the pro-environment crowd.

California landscape and marijuana. (Image: EL / TO; Adapted: Rennett Stowe / Flickr, PabloEvans / Flickr)

The discussion over marijuana in California is a heated one, and not just because of THC.

Since 1996, marijuana has been legal in California for medical purposes, setting off an increase in marijuana cultivation. But while that’s good for the pro-marijuana crowd, it’s not as good for the pro-environment crowd. Why? California’s marijuana industry is having a serious affect on wildlife and water, now aggravated by the state’s worst-ever drought.

Proposition 215 was passed in 1996, and since then officials have recorded more and more streams going dry, even causing one country to outlaw personal grows. But officials hold that it’s not really personal growing that’s the problem. According to the AP, “State fish and wildlife officials say much of the marijuana being grown in northern counties under the state’s medical pot law is not being used for legal, personal use, but for sale both in California and states where pot is still illegal.”

That demand is in turn increasing supply, in the form of larger-scale marijuana farming, which is having a serious environmental effect.

“People are coming in, denuding the hillsides, damming the creeks and mixing in fertilizers that are not allowed in the U.S. into our watersheds,” Denise Rushing, a Lake County supervisor told the AP. “When rains come, it flows downstream into the lake and our water supply.”

The affected watershed is often home to endangered salmon and steelhead, protected under federal law. According to an article in Outside magazine, looking at the threat of marijuana farms to fish, “The Department of Fish and Wildlife is spending $12 million annually on fish-habitat restoration in Northern California, and that money is disappearing as quickly as the state’s water. But if these creeks dry up for three or four years in a row, it will all be for nothing. There will be no generations of fish to return; the runs will be dead.”

So how much of the water issues can be attributed to marijuana? It’s hard to know exactly, simply because of the nature of the industry. But if officials are right, it’s easy to start pointing fingers.

“It’s impossible to know exactly how much water is being drawn from streams for marijuana farms because, by its very nature, the industry is unregulated. Estimates for how much a plant consumes in a day vary from three to six gallons, depending on size, how they’re grown, and whether you ask Fish and Wildlife or a grower. But with farms increasing at unprecedented rates in past years, many residents believe marijuana is the biggest factor threatening Humboldt’s watersheds,” Erik Neumann wrote in his Outside magazine article.

One biologist found a way to get a pretty precise estimate, though, by combining Google mapping technology and satellite data to find marijuana farms paired with government data on stream flows. Scott Bauer, a wildlife biologist, estimates that around 30,000 marijuana plants are being grown in each river system, and that each of those plants uses about six gallons of water per day during marijuana’s 150 day growing season. As Bauer told the AP, “We didn’t know they could consume all the water in a stream.”

Some marijuana farmers are working to clean things up, but the situation has been referred to as a “full-scale environmental disaster” by one Fish and Wildlife official.

The argument on the other side is that pot farmers are being unfairly blamed for environmental damage that can also be attributed to things like the timber industry and overfishing. As water in California becomes a hotter and hotter issue, you can be sure that the dispute over marijuana and its effects on the environment will continue.

Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn

Dear Truthout Community,

If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.

We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.

Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.

There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.

After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?

It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.

We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.

We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.

Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.

We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.

With love, rage, and solidarity,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy