I haven’t been closely following the developments in British politics since the recent election, but people have been asking me to comment on the emergence of Jeremy Corbyn as a serious contender for the leadership of the Labour Party. And I do have a few thoughts.
First, it’s really important to understand that the austerity policies of the current government are not, as much of the British press portrays them, the only responsible answer to the country’s fiscal crisis. There is no fiscal crisis, except in the imagination of Britain’s Very Serious People. The government’s policies had large costs, and the economic upturn that Britain experienced when fiscal tightening was put on hold does not justify those costs. In fact, the whole austerian ideology is based on fantasy economics; it’s actually the anti-austerians who are basing their views on modern macroeconomic theory and the best evidence.
Nonetheless, all the contenders for Labour leadership other than Mr. Corbyn – a member of Parliament representing Islington North – have chosen to accept the austerian ideology in full, including the false claims that Labour was fiscally irresponsible and that this irresponsibility caused the crisis. As Simon Wren-Lewis, an Oxford economist, says, when Labour supporters reject this move, they aren’t “moving left,” they’re refusing to follow a party elite that has decided to move sharply to the right.
What’s been going on within the Labour Party reminds me of what went on in the United States within the Democratic Party during the Reagan administration and again for a while under President George W. Bush: Many leading Democrats fell into what Josh Marshall at Talking Points Memo used to call the “cringe” – basically accepting the right’s worldview, but trying to win office by being a bit milder. There was a cartoon during the Reagan years that, as I remember it, showed Democrats laying out their platform: big military spending, tax cuts for the rich, benefit cuts for the poor. “But how does that make you different from Republicans?” the caption read. “Compassion – we care about the victims of our policies.”
I don’t fully understand the apparent moral collapse of New Labour after an election that was not, if you look at the numbers, actually an overwhelming endorsement of the Tories. But should we really be surprised if many Labour supporters still believe in what their party used to stand for, and are unwilling to support the “Cringe Caucus” in its flight to the right?
Help us Prepare for Trump’s Day One
Trump is busy getting ready for Day One of his presidency – but so is Truthout.
Trump has made it no secret that he is planning a demolition-style attack on both specific communities and democracy as a whole, beginning on his first day in office. With over 25 executive orders and directives queued up for January 20, he’s promised to “launch the largest deportation program in American history,” roll back anti-discrimination protections for transgender students, and implement a “drill, drill, drill” approach to ramp up oil and gas extraction.
Organizations like Truthout are also being threatened by legislation like HR 9495, the “nonprofit killer bill” that would allow the Treasury Secretary to declare any nonprofit a “terrorist-supporting organization” and strip its tax-exempt status without due process. Progressive media like Truthout that has courageously focused on reporting on Israel’s genocide in Gaza are in the bill’s crosshairs.
As journalists, we have a responsibility to look at hard realities and communicate them to you. We hope that you, like us, can use this information to prepare for what’s to come.
And if you feel uncertain about what to do in the face of a second Trump administration, we invite you to be an indispensable part of Truthout’s preparations.
In addition to covering the widespread onslaught of draconian policy, we’re shoring up our resources for what might come next for progressive media: bad-faith lawsuits from far-right ghouls, legislation that seeks to strip us of our ability to receive tax-deductible donations, and further throttling of our reach on social media platforms owned by Trump’s sycophants.
We’re preparing right now for Trump’s Day One: building a brave coalition of movement media; reaching out to the activists, academics, and thinkers we trust to shine a light on the inner workings of authoritarianism; and planning to use journalism as a tool to equip movements to protect the people, lands, and principles most vulnerable to Trump’s destruction.
We urgently need your help to prepare. As you know, our December fundraiser is our most important of the year and will determine the scale of work we’ll be able to do in 2025. We’ve set two goals: to raise $115,000 in one-time donations and to add 1365 new monthly donors by midnight on December 31.
Today, we’re asking all of our readers to start a monthly donation or make a one-time donation – as a commitment to stand with us on day one of Trump’s presidency, and every day after that, as we produce journalism that combats authoritarianism, censorship, injustice, and misinformation. You’re an essential part of our future – please join the movement by making a tax-deductible donation today.
If you have the means to make a substantial gift, please dig deep during this critical time!
With gratitude and resolve,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy