As the House’s impeachment inquiry into President Trump’s dealings with Ukraine progresses, the issue of nepotism has become one of the subplots. President Trump is accused of withholding U.S. military aid as he pressured Ukraine’s president to investigate Hunter Biden, the son of presidential candidate Joe Biden. As recently as November 20, the ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee suggested that Hunter Biden should be subpoenaed to testify. Meanwhile, Donald Trump, Jr., of all people, alleges that Hunter Biden is profiting off his father’s name. As many have been quick to point out, the same critique could apply to Donald, Jr., Ivanka, Eric, and Jared Kushner.
Nepotism comes from the Italian word for nephew, nipote. Back in the Middle Ages and during the Renaissance, “nepotism” referred to the objectionable practice of popes giving favors and jobs to their nephews. The “nephews” in question were really illegitimate sons of the should-have-been-celibate popes. A prime example of this nepotism was Pope Alexander VI, who was also known as Rodrigo Borgia, and whose son Cesare Borgia was a cardinal.
There is a difference between what is colloquially called “nepotism” — typically getting any private sector job through a family member, and legally prohibited nepotism, which is only triggered in narrow circumstances related to certain government jobs.
Today, nepotism has a legal meaning that differs from state to state and at the federal level. In some states, it is illegal to hire a relative to a government position. In my home state of Florida, a government official may not hire a relative, unless they live in a town smaller than 35,000 people. Meanwhile in Minnesota, it is perfectly legal for a governmental official to hire a family member. If you’re curious about nepotism rules in your state, the National Council of State Legislatures has a nifty chart.
Federal anti-nepotism rules were adopted after President John F. Kennedy appointed his brother Robert attorney general, a move that rubbed lots of people the wrong way — and for good reason. The attorney general should represent the interests of the American people. But with a sibling sitting in the White House, the legal oversight of the Justice Department’s top official could easily be clouded by familial ties. Now, a law prohibits federal officials, including members of Congress, from appointing relatives to any agency or department over which the official exercises authority. This prohibition includes parents, children, spouses, aunts, uncles, first cousins, in-laws, nieces and nephews.
So what are Jared and Ivanka Trump doing working in the White House given this law? According to the Justice Department Office of Legal Counsel, while the law prevents the president from appointing them to an agency, like the Department of Justice, it doesn’t apply to Jared and Ivanka because the White House is not technically an agency. As the Brennan Center’s National Task Force on Rule of Law & Democracy highlighted in a recent report, and as this example shows, anti-nepotism rules should be tightened to include the White House.
Outside of government, hiring relatives is not typically prohibited by law. It’s perfectly legal and not unusual for the Trump Organization, a private family business, to be staffed with people related to Donald Trump. It’s accurate to say that, with Donald Trump, Jr. and Eric Trump running the company, which was founded by their grandfather, there is nepotism at the Trump Organization — but that’s not necessarily problematic.
Certainly, there are advantages to having the same name as a well-known politician when entering politics. Just ask Kentucky Gov.-elect Andy Beshear, whose father, Gov. Steve Beshear, held office from 2007 to 2015. Having the same last name likely helped Andy clinch a razor-thin victory, though it was the voters who ultimately empowered him.
But being related to a rich, powerful, or famous person can carry other advantages. Hunter Biden himself has said that he would not have had certain doors open to him if he were not related to Joe Biden. But like Trump hiring his own family in his personal business and in the White House, that is not a crime.
Still, the behavior of the Trumps and the Bidens can be distinguished. While Trump hired his daughter and his son-in-law for government jobs, there’s no evidence that Joe Biden during his time as vice president actively used his influence to help Hunter find employment or with his work.
Meanwhile, President Trump is promoting — wait for it — the new book by his son, Donald Trump, Jr. Doing this is a violation of federal ethics rules for everyone who draws a U.S. government paycheck — except for the president.
The views expressed are the author’s own and not necessarily those of the Brennan Center.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.