Honest, paywall-free news is rare. Please support our boldly independent journalism with a donation of any size.
Vice President Kamala Harris delivered a historic loss on Tuesday, the effects of which will reverberate for generations to come. This defeat came after she and the Democratic Party committed to a right-wing lurch that, in the end, served only to empower her opponent and usher in a new era of fascism under Donald Trump.
As of Wednesday, Harris had lost every swing state that had been called by The Associated Press — with Georgia, Michigan, North Carolina, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin going to Trump — and was behind in the last swing state of Arizona. Trump’s win, called by the AP early Wednesday morning, is a walloping for the ages, with data showing that the vast majority of counties swung toward Trump compared to in 2020.
In the end, Trump is likely going to win with over 300 electoral votes. As of writing, Harris was also badly losing the popular vote by a margin of roughly 5 million.
Despite the warnings of the left, Democrats dug down on a tried-and-failed strategy of courting Republicans this election. For a short period after President Joe Biden dropped out, Harris had a huge amount of momentum, even picking a progressive favorite, Tim Walz, as her running mate.
That momentum was quickly quashed as the Democrats ran to the right. The campaign uplifted Republicans at the Democratic National Convention (DNC) and touted endorsements like that of Republican Dick Cheney, who is infamous for engineering the U.S’s catastrophic invasion of Iraq.
Some small gains in polling made by the promise of a new face of the Democratic Party slowly diminished. In the month leading up to the election, Harris campaigned more with Republican former House member Liz Cheney than anyone else — including more left-leaning supporters like Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-New York) or United Auto Workers President Shawn Fain.
At the same time, the campaign outright ignored the left, refusing to grant progressives even a symbolic victory, like allowing a Palestinian to make a short speech onstage at the DNC. Progressive policies were consistently shown as winners in polls; multiple surveys showed that Harris could gain ground in swing states if she tossed Biden’s approach to Israel’s genocide in Gaza and backed an arms embargo.
Instead, in a moment that will likely go down as a key reason for her defeat, Harris promised in an October appearance on “The View” that she wouldn’t do anything differently from Biden — and then doubled back later to say that the only thing she would do differently is have a Republican cabinet member.
Despite this relentless courting, exit polls showed that Republicans still overwhelmingly voted for Trump, and that this imagined base of conservatives who want to vote against Trump doesn’t exist. According to NBC News’s exit poll, 94 percent of Republicans voted for Trump, while 5 percent voted for Harris — roughly the same as the 4 percent of Democrats who went for Trump. Other polls, like that of Edison Research, found the same proportions.
It’s not just who they uplifted on the campaign trail. Democrats also shifted their platform to the right. Many parts of Harris’s immigration proposals were virtually indistinguishable from Trump’s 2016 and 2020 policies, with Harris committing to rebuilding Trump’s southern border wall; parroting right-wing myths about drug smuggling; and generally adopting a racist anti-immigration approach.
At the same time, Harris pledged more policing, failed to meaningfully address issues like preserving health care access and Social Security, and, as the country was hit with a historically disastrous hurricane, rejected crucial climate policies like a fracking ban.
Important Message: Please Read
For 25 years, Truthout has survived by publishing impactful investigative journalism and analysis; distributing full editions 365 days a year; and building a community of readers who support us with small, hard-earned donations.
Eighty percent of our $3 million yearly budget comes from small donors alone. Of those, 8,000 readers support us with monthly donations. Back in 2018, when Facebook decided to suppress the circulation of posts made by organizations, thereby cutting readers off from seeing many articles shared by the news organizations they had intentionally decided to follow, Truthout’s total traffic declined by 40 percent, as nearly all of our traffic from that platform disappeared.
Now, Google has recently rolled out its AI search bar, providing AI summaries instead of directing readers to our site. Google Search is our single largest source of traffic; it’s the route by which nearly one third of our readers find us. Much like in 2018, a shocking 40 percent of our Google traffic has disappeared overnight.
It will not be easy for Truthout to shoulder this blow. Nor will it be easy for our peers and collaborators — news sites that depend on traffic and aren’t bankrolled by large corporations.
If you can support Truthout with a donation today, you can help us resist the AI onslaught. Please give today.