The first transcripts from the House of Representatives’ closed-door impeachment probe were released on Tuesday. As CNN’s Chris Cillizza put it, that was “the day when it became damn near impossible for any serious Republican lawmaker to deny that there was a clear quid pro quo proffered by President Donald Trump and his administration to Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky.”
Maybe those words were a challenge. Any logical reading of the revelations from the released transcript would suggest such responses, but Republicans’ actual reaction to Tuesday’s blockbuster once again reinforces the reality that such rationality is all but buried in Donald Trump’s Washington.
With a substantial revision to his initial testimony before the House Intelligence Committee, Gordon Sondland, the United States ambassador to the European Union, confirmed that he told Ukrainian officials that U.S. military aid was tied to their commitment to launching the political investigations Trump wanted. The bribery plot, as Sondland described it, included a Sept. 1 trip to Warsaw to deliver the quid pro quo message to the Ukrainians: Military aid would be withheld until Trump got his kickback.
Sondland testified that he understood Ukraine would need to meet Trump’s “demands” before a meeting between Trump and Zelensky could take place. And with that, a key witness — Trump’s best defense witness, until now — apparently concerned about possible perjury charges after a wealth of conflicting testimony from other career diplomats, blew away any previous denials of a clear quid pro quo. Republicans on the Hill, in keeping with recent tradition, don’t seem to care.
Consider Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee, who demanded the release of the transcripts last month.
If House D’s refuse to release full transcript of Volker testimony as requested by Congressman Jordan, it will be an abuse of power.
— Lindsey Graham (@LindseyGrahamSC) October 9, 2019
On Tuesday, in a predictable if remarkable walk-back Graham said he would not even read the transcripts he wanted released — presumably so he isn’t forced to change his position.
“I’ve written the whole process off,” Graham told reporters on Tuesday, “I think this is a bunch of B.S.”
Notably, Graham said in September that he might support impeachment if there was evidence of a quid pro quo beyond the White House’s memo on Trump’s July call with Zelensky. Here are the senator’s exact words: “What would’ve been wrong is if the president had suggested to the Ukrainian government that if you don’t do what I want you to do regarding the Bidens, we’re not going to give you the aid.” Sondland has just testified that that is exactly what happened.
A similar switch happened on Fox News, where in September, “Fox & Friends” host Steve Doocy said: “If the president said, ‘I’ll give you the money, but you’ve got to investigate Joe Biden,’ that’d be off the rails wrong.”
“The Ambassador to the European Union has already testified, he said there was no quid pro quo. He said the President had told him that.” @kilmeade @foxandfriends
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) October 22, 2019
On Tuesday, the one and only email alert the network sent its subscribers ignored Sondland’s damning testimony in favor of misleading spin on testimony from another witness, former U.S. envoy to Ukraine Kurt Volker.
“Ex-envoy Volker told House panel Trump did not tie Ukraine meeting to push for Biden probe, transcripts show,” the original report headline read. In the revised transcript of his testimony, however, Volker admitted that he texted to a top Ukrainian official the script that Trump wanted Zelensky to read when announcing a public probe into Biden.
Volker further testified:
[The Ukrainian official] said, I think quite appropriately, that if they are responding to an official request, that’s one thing. If there’s no official request, that’s different. And I agree with that. … And my comment back to him was I think those are good reasons. And in addition, I just think it’s important that you avoid anything that would look like it would play into our domestic politics, and this could. So just don’t do it.
Furthermore, Volker tore down the right-wing conspiracy that Biden had encouraged Ukraine to fire former Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin out of some nefarious self-interest: Biden, Volker said, “was executing U.S. policy at the time and what was widely understood internationally to be the right policy.”
Despite Volker’s clarity, Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, a staunch Trump ally whom Republicans hope will find a way to derail impeachment proceedings, continued to insist that Volker’s testimony somehow exonerated the president. Of course, he too ignored the testimony of Sondland.
We asked Amb. Volker, Special Envoy to Ukraine, “Did @POTUS ever withhold a meeting with President Zelensky… until the Ukrainians committed to investigate the allegations… concerning the 2016 election?”
Volker: “The answer to the question is no… there was no linkage.” pic.twitter.com/3i9prqdHwu
— Rep. Jim Jordan (@Jim_Jordan) November 5, 2019
Another Republican, Rep. Lee Zeldin of New York, performed a similar act of cherry-picking.
I asked Volker: And in no way, shape, or form in either the readouts from the United States or Ukraine did you receive any indication whatsoever for anything that resembles a quid pro quo?
Volker: Correct pic.twitter.com/vdmJnSWPyo
— Lee Zeldin (@LeeMZeldin) November 5, 2019
Rep. Scott Perry of Pennsylvania simply ignored Sondland’s new revelations, insisting that both he and Volker testified there was no “quid pro quo.”
When asked about Gordon Sondland’s “no quid-pro-quo” text to Bill Taylor, Kurt Volker stated, “Gordon was repeating what we all understood.” – which was no quid-pro-quo. pic.twitter.com/VMmTIz6RFF
— Rep. Scott Perry (@RepScottPerry) November 5, 2019
Not a single Republican lawmaker has given any indication that he or she is seriously considering a vote to impeach Trump or remove him from office. No amount of evidence appears to be able to puncture the bubble that the party has built to protect itself, and its president, from the truth. What’s more likely is that by week’s end, Sondland and everyone else who has testified will be smeared as NeverTrump moles.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment. We are presently looking for 500 new monthly donors in the next 10 days.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy