Businessman Vivek Ramaswamy, a longshot candidate for the Republican Party’s 2024 presidential nomination, tweeted his belief on Friday that some young people in the United States are undeserving of the democratic right to vote.
Ramaswamy went on to say that Congress should pass a constitutional amendment barring 18-25 year olds from voting, with some exceptions.
“Young people no longer value a country that they simply inherit,” Ramaswamy claimed in his tweet. “People value something more if they have a stake in creating. That’s why I’m proposing a constitutional amendment that requires 18-year-olds to pass a civics test or meet a national service requirement.”
Ramaswamy’s tweet included a link to his website, where he details his proposal.
Under Ramaswamy’s proposal, individuals between the ages of 18 and 25 would have to serve in the military for at least six months in order to be eligible to vote. Barring that, people within that age range could vote only if they served in a first responder role or passed a civics test similar to the one used for naturalization citizenship tests.
Notably, just 7 percent of the U.S. population has served in the military, and fewer than 2 percent of the populace is currently a first responder. Furthermore, a 2018 survey found that two out of every three American voters would fail the civics test that Ramaswamy is saying young adults should be required to pass.
The provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 currently ban tests for voting, which were used to disenfranchise people of color for decades. Additionally, the 26th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution requires that states allow people to vote if they are 18 years of age or older.
Ramaswamy’s proposal, which would be a constitutional amendment, would overturn both standards, which have been in place for more than half a century. It’s unlikely that enough states would ratify the amendment for it to pass, but other Republicans have also expressed a desire to raise the voting age, following their party’s less-than-stellar showing in the 2022 midterm elections, which saw many young voters support Democratic candidates for office.
Notably, because Gen Z is more racially diverse than any other generation in U.S. history, restricting the voting rights of people in this age range would disenfranchise millions of nonwhite voters. These voters are also more likely to support LGBTQ rights or identify as LGBTQ than any other generation, and disrupting their ability to vote could result in state and federal governments that are more likely to impose homophobic and transphobic laws.
Just after the midterms, ACT For America chair and anti-Muslim commentator Brigitte Gabriel expressed her support for changing the threshold to vote. “Raise the voting age to 21,” she wrote on Twitter.
Fox News personality Jesse Watters also disparaged young voters after the midterm elections. “The fact that these youth voters are coming in so strong in an off-year is very concerning. It looks like they’ve been brainwashed,” he said.
Conservative radio host Peter Schiff has similarly called for raising the voting age. “Let’s raise the voting age to 28,” he said on his program last year. “If I was still 18 I’d support this.”
While it’s unlikely that Republicans will succeed in implementing changes to the voting age, GOP lawmakers in states across the country have proposed and passed a number of bills imposing voting restrictions that disproportionately impact young people. These laws include voter ID requirements that do not include college or university cards, mandates that bar polling places from being located on or near campuses, and the shortening of mail-in ballot deadlines, all of which make it harder for young people to vote.
Young people and organizations dedicated to empowering youth voters are fighting these efforts by filing lawsuits against voting restrictions, providing campuses with financial resources to help students overcome geographical barriers, and educating young people about efforts to curtail their rights.
Young people are much more civically engaged than Ramaswamy claimed in his recent social media posts, organizers for young voters say.
“There is so much power in voting, and for youth, there is an extraordinary commitment to voting,” said Maxim Thorne, CEO of Civic Influences, a nonprofit group that aims to help young people vote, speaking to Truthout’s Ngakiya Camara in February.
Help us Prepare for Trump’s Day One
Trump is busy getting ready for Day One of his presidency – but so is Truthout.
Trump has made it no secret that he is planning a demolition-style attack on both specific communities and democracy as a whole, beginning on his first day in office. With over 25 executive orders and directives queued up for January 20, he’s promised to “launch the largest deportation program in American history,” roll back anti-discrimination protections for transgender students, and implement a “drill, drill, drill” approach to ramp up oil and gas extraction.
Organizations like Truthout are also being threatened by legislation like HR 9495, the “nonprofit killer bill” that would allow the Treasury Secretary to declare any nonprofit a “terrorist-supporting organization” and strip its tax-exempt status without due process. Progressive media like Truthout that has courageously focused on reporting on Israel’s genocide in Gaza are in the bill’s crosshairs.
As journalists, we have a responsibility to look at hard realities and communicate them to you. We hope that you, like us, can use this information to prepare for what’s to come.
And if you feel uncertain about what to do in the face of a second Trump administration, we invite you to be an indispensable part of Truthout’s preparations.
In addition to covering the widespread onslaught of draconian policy, we’re shoring up our resources for what might come next for progressive media: bad-faith lawsuits from far-right ghouls, legislation that seeks to strip us of our ability to receive tax-deductible donations, and further throttling of our reach on social media platforms owned by Trump’s sycophants.
We’re preparing right now for Trump’s Day One: building a brave coalition of movement media; reaching out to the activists, academics, and thinkers we trust to shine a light on the inner workings of authoritarianism; and planning to use journalism as a tool to equip movements to protect the people, lands, and principles most vulnerable to Trump’s destruction.
We urgently need your help to prepare. As you know, our December fundraiser is our most important of the year and will determine the scale of work we’ll be able to do in 2025. We’ve set two goals: to raise $110,000 in one-time donations and to add 1350 new monthly donors by midnight on December 31.
Today, we’re asking all of our readers to start a monthly donation or make a one-time donation – as a commitment to stand with us on day one of Trump’s presidency, and every day after that, as we produce journalism that combats authoritarianism, censorship, injustice, and misinformation. You’re an essential part of our future – please join the movement by making a tax-deductible donation today.
If you have the means to make a substantial gift, please dig deep during this critical time!
With gratitude and resolve,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy