The Democratic chair of the congressional Joint Economic Committee warned Wednesday that the GOP’s plan to use a looming debt ceiling fight as leverage to secure cuts to Social Security and Medicare would be “economically catastrophic for seniors, families, and our entire economy.”
“Past debt-limit brinksmanship resulted in the first-ever downgrade of the U.S. credit rating and cost the country billions of dollars in lost economic activity, even though a default was ultimately avoided,” Rep. Don Beyer (D-Va.) said in a statement after several House Republicans outlined their intentions in interviews with Bloomberg Government on Tuesday.
“This announcement comes after a previous proposal from the leader of the Senate Republicans’ campaign committee to sunset Social Security, Medicare, and veterans’ benefits in five years,” Beyer continued, referring to Sen. Rick Scott’s (R-Fla.) proposal. “Republicans are once again getting in line to raise costs for low- and middle-income workers and families while offering giveaways to the wealthiest and corporate interests.”
“Not only are these economically disastrous — resulting in fewer jobs, slower economic growth, and higher household costs — they are morally reprehensible,” the Virginia Democrat added.
Several House Republicans vying for the chairmanship of the chamber’s budget committee told Bloomberg that they view a debt ceiling clash — which is expected early next year as the Treasury Department reaches its arbitrary borrowing limit — as an opportunity to pursue long-sought changes to Social Security and Medicare, including benefit cuts and an increase in the retirement age.
“The debt limit is clearly one of those tools that Republicans — that a Republican-controlled Congress — will use,” said Rep. Jason Smith (R-Mo.), who is currently the ranking member of the House Budget Committee.
With the pivotal November midterms less than a month away, House Democrats wasted little time pouncing on the GOP’s latest signal that it plans to pursue cuts to Social Security and Medicare if it retakes control of Congress in the midterm elections, despite the programs’ popularity.
“Republicans have let us in on their plans for Medicare and Social Security — raise the eligibility age and cut benefits. Seniors deserve better,” Rep. John Larson (D-Conn.), chair of the House Ways and Means Social Security Subcommittee, wrote on social media Tuesday. “My plan, Social Security 2100: A Sacred Trust, will protect and expand benefits, not cut them!”
FYI: The reason we keep saying Republicans want to cut Social Security and Medicare is because they keep saying they want to cut Social Security and Medicare.https://t.co/5Wz1Pa4iHt
— House Budget Committee (@HouseBudgetDems) October 11, 2022
Politico reported late last month that a number of Republican congressional candidates — including Arizona U.S. Senate nominee Blake Masters and New Hampshire U.S. Senate hopeful Don Bolduc — have voiced support for cutting or privatizing Social Security and Medicare on the campaign trail in recent weeks.
“The privatization is hugely important,” Bolduc said of Medicare and Medicaid during an August town hall. “Getting government out of it, getting government money with strings attached out of it.”
The official policy agenda of House Republicans also leaves the door open to Medicare and Social Security cuts and privatization, as Common Dreams reported last month.
In key battleground states such as Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, Democratic candidates have seized on their GOP opponents’ attacks on traditional Medicare and Social Security and vowed to defend the programs from right-wing attacks.
After incumbent Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) said in an August radio interview that Congress “ought to turn everything into discretionary spending” and characterized mandatory Social Security and Medicare outlays as a “debt burden,” Democratic challenger Mandela Barnes warned that the GOP senator “wants to strip working people of the Social Security and Medicare they’ve earned.”
Pennsylvania U.S. Senate candidate John Fetterman has issued similar warnings about his Republican opponent, Dr. Mehmet Oz, who has pledged to further privatize Medicare.
“We can never allow Social Security and Medicare to be weakened by the GOP,” Fetterman wrote in a recent Twitter post. “Dr. Oz would be another vote to take away these critical lifelines for our seniors.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.