Skip to content Skip to footer

Gavin Newsom Calls for Longshot Proposal: Amend Constitution for Gun Reforms

Newsom says the amendment is necessary because “a lot of the laws we’ve passed are being rolled back by federal courts.”

California Gov. Gavin Newsom speaks to union workers and volunteers on election day at the IBEW Local 6 union hall on September 14, 2021, in San Francisco, California.

On Thursday, California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) proposed a new amendment to the U.S. Constitution to address gun violence in the United States.

The proposed 28th Amendment to the Constitution, Newsom said on his official government website, would enact “common sense gun safety measures that Democrats, Republicans, Independents, and gun owners overwhelmingly support — while leaving the 2nd Amendment unchanged and respecting America’s gun-owning tradition.”

The amendment would instill specific items long sought after by gun reform advocates. It would, for example, raise the federal minimum age to purchase any firearm, currently at 18, to 21 years of age, as well as mandate universal background checks, Newsom’s press release said. The amendment would also create a “reasonable waiting period” for all gun purchases, and bar the purchase of assault weapons altogether.

In an interview with “The Today Show” that aired on Thursday, Newsom said that the amendment is necessary due to courts across the country — including the conservative-led U.S. Supreme Court — overturning gun laws in states that have decided to place greater restrictions on ownership.

“A lot of the laws we’ve passed are being rolled back by federal courts,” Newsom explained.

The amendment process is a difficult one, particularly in today’s deeply partisan climate. To have an amendment proposed to the states, as outlined in Article V of the Constitution, requires two-thirds congressional approval, or two-thirds of all states agreeing; after either of those two actions happen, three-quarters of all states must agree to ratify the measure before it becomes an official amendment.

Because more than half of state legislatures are run by the Republican Party, which is vehemently opposed to almost all gun reform, passage of such an amendment appears unlikely. But Newsom has said it’s still worth pursuing “because [Republicans’] constituency demands it,” noting that recent polling data shows that most Americans support the measures that are laid out in his proposed amendment.

Many amendments have been passed after initially facing strong opposition. Although the 19th Amendment, which recognizes the right of women to vote, was first proposed in 1878, it took Congress four decades to finally pass a resolution sending it to the states for ratification, which they did in 1920. The last amendment to the Constitution, the 27th Amendment, which places restrictions on how lawmakers in Congress can give themselves pay raises, was first passed as a resolution by Congress in 1789 alongside the Bill of Rights, but wasn’t ratified by three-quarters of the states until 1992.

Although it could take several decades for a proposal like Newsom’s to pass, the California governor said he’s confident it could be enacted much sooner.

Asked if it could be passed at some point in his lifetime, Newsom said, “I hope so,” adding, “If you don’t start, it will never happen.”

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.