A bill advancing in the Florida state Senate would forbid the removal of memorials related to Confederate figures or events, and ban the addition of text on or near monuments to provide added historical context.
The proposal would also impose steep fines on individuals who damage historical memorials, including Confederate statues, plaques, and other sites glorifying people who fought to preserve slavery in the Civil War.
Senate Bill 1096 would fine a person “treble damages” — or three times the actual amount of repair costs — if a person is found guilty of damaging a public monument in the state, including Confederate monuments. A person could also be subjected to punitive damages in addition to the treble damages.
The bill would provide Florida residents with the means to sue individuals or groups who they believe have damaged or removed a monument, or added items that change the monuments’ original meaning. Under the terms of the bill, a monument could only be removed if a public works project required its relocation.
The Senate Community Affairs Committee forwarded the Republican-backed proposal on Wednesday by a party-line vote of 6-2. A state House of Representatives version of the bill passed last week. The Senate bill still has to pass the Rules Committee before it can undergo full Senate consideration.
Racial justice advocates have disputed state Sen. Jonathan Martin’s (R) claim that the bill aims to preserve the state’s history, pointing out that the statues glorify Confederate figures without providing context on their role in the fight to uphold slavery.
“What I like about these memorials in public places is that everybody has the opportunity to see who we were,” Martin said. “The older the monument, the more important it is, because it provides a starting point for what our country began as, who led our country.”
In spite of Martin’s purported concerns about preserving history, the bill would forbid adding any historical context on or near existing statues or memorials. A statue honoring Confederate soldiers in front of Putnam County Courthouse, for example — which states that “The Principles For Which They Fought Will Live Eternally” — could not have a plaque placed next to it recognizing that those “principles” included the continued enslavement of Black people.
State Sen. Rosalind Osgood (D), who is Black, said passage of the bill would be a mistake.
“I’m hoping that we’ll get to a point where we can have some real tough conversations to understand why different groups feel different ways about certain things. People that look like me really are offended by a lot of the Confederate monuments,” Osgood said.
The lawmaker also pointed out that many of the memorials honoring Confederate-era figures or ideals weren’t put up during or immediately after the Civil War, but during the 1950s and ‘60s in reaction to the Civil Rights Movement.
Indeed, according to Lecia Brooks, former chief of staff and culture at the Southern Poverty Law Center, such monuments were intended to remind Black Americans of their subjugation under Jim Crow laws and other discriminatory policies during most of the 20th century.
“I know what this statue means,” Brooks said to FiveThirtyEight, speaking about Confederate monuments as a whole. “It’s a reminder to stay in my place.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.