The Florida Supreme Court released two opinions on Monday that will affect abortion access in the state, including one in which a ballot initiative on reproductive rights will move forward for voters to decide on this fall.
Between then and now, however, abortion access will be severely limited within the state.
In a 6-1 decision, the state’s highest court overturned decades of previously established precedent regarding abortion rights in the state. For years, a privacy protection clause in the Florida constitution had been interpreted as protecting a right to abortion. After a six-week ban on abortion passed the state legislature and was signed into law by Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis, abortion rights groups challenged it on the basis that it violated those previously held precedents.
The State Supreme Court disagreed in its ruling, stating that there was “no clear right to abortion embodied within the Privacy Clause” of the constitution — contradicting years of stare decisis decisions that have ruled otherwise. The six-week ban will be implemented starting in May.
Abortion rights proponents blasted the ruling as woefully flawed.
“The new law, the six-week ban, in some few weeks, that is going to be a potential life and death matter for a lot of women,” said Cecile Scoon, co-president of the League of Women Voters of Florida.
“This is absolutely catastrophic for Florida and for the entire Southeast. In 30 days, Florida will implement a near-total abortion ban,” said Hayley McMahon, a public health scientist who studies abortion at Emory RISE.
In a separate ruling, however, the State Supreme Court gave abortion rights proponents some hope that the six-week ban could be overturned through a ballot initiative. In a 4-3 decision, the court said that a challenge from the state attorney general’s office against the ballot initiative wasn’t strong enough to prevent it from moving forward. The initiative will appear on the November ballot, the court ruled.
State Attorney General Ashley Moody had alleged that the wording of the proposed constitutional amendment was too confusing for voters, as it would allow abortion access in the state up to fetal “viability” — a time frame generally viewed to be around 22-25 weeks of pregnancy. But Floridians already lived under such precedent, as viability protections have been in place across the entire country for nearly half a century under standards established in the federal Supreme Court case Roe v. Wade, which was upended by a far right conservative iteration of that Court in 2022.
The Florida Supreme Court’s ruling on that matter was celebrated by abortion rights activists.
“We are thrilled that Florida voters will have the chance to make their voices heard on this pressing issue in November,” Center for Reproductive Rights president and CEO Nancy Northup said in a statement.
Polling shows that most Floridians are supportive of abortion rights that extend far beyond the six-week ban that will soon become law in the state, and even beyond the 15-week ban that is currently being enforced. But to become an amendment, the ballot initiative will have to pass with support from a supermajority of voters, requiring a 60 percent threshold to become part of the state’s highest governing document.
The vote is likely to be a very close one — in a University of North Florida poll from November, 62 percent of voters said that they would vote “yes” on the measure, indicating a high likelihood that it can pass. However, the margin of error for that poll was around 4.37 points, meaning that it’s possible fewer than 60 percent of voters in the state would actually back the measure. Conversely, it could also mean that greater than 66 percent of the people support it, too.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.