Did you know that Truthout is a nonprofit and independently funded by readers like you? If you value what we do, please support our work with a donation.
Obama-Biden Transition Project / Flickr)” width=”400″ height=”252″ /> (Photo: Obama-Biden Transition Project / Flickr)Watch out, banks that engage in criminal activity (aka just about every large bank): Eric Holder and the Department of Justice are coming for you!
I’ll give you a moment to stop chuckling. Seriously, though, Attorney General Holder said it himself. In a video released Monday morning, Holder vowed that prosecutions of banks that operate outside of the law are forthcoming, claiming, “There is no such thing as ‘too big to jail.’”
“Some have used that phrase [“too big to jail”] to describe the theory that certain financial institutions – even if they engage in criminal misconduct – should be considered immune from prosecution due to their sheer size and their influence on the economy,” Holder elaborated. “That view is mistaken.”
Hmmm, where would they get the idea? Maybe from Holder himself, who just last year said, “I am concerned that the size of these institutions becomes so large that it does become difficult for us to prosecute them when we are hit with indications that if we do prosecute, if we do bring a criminal charge, it will have a negative impact on the national economy.”
Add that to the fact that, in the past several years, banks have been implicated in all sorts of fraudulent, unconscionable activities, yet the Department of Justice hasn’t brought a single major bank to trial. The worst that’s happened to the banks is that they pay out-of-court settlements where they admit to nothing and pay fines that are a fraction of the profits they made from their criminal behaviors. In other words, these punishments are slaps on the wrist that still prove profitable to the banks. If the government is not outright colluding with these financial institutions, it is at least willfully standing by and allowing it to happen.
Although Holder’s recent vow raises justifiable skepticism, there is some reason to be optimistic. His comments were not off-the-cuff remarks to a reporter, but part of a carefully planned video release. Holder also said, “I am personally [emphasis his own] monitoring the status of these investigations; I am resolved to seeing them through.” By staking his own reputation on future prosecutions, he indicates that trials are in the pipeline.
Although Holder did not mention any specific banks by name in his video release, many speculate that the statement is a reference to banks like BNP Paribas SA and Credit Suisse AG. BNP Paribas is in hot water – to the tune of more than $1 billion – for violating U.S. sanctions with Iraq. Meanwhile, Credit Suisse is being investigated for helping Americans to hide money to avoid paying taxes in the United States – you know, typical Swiss bank account stuff.
While I wish the singled out banks would have more significant domestic ties (like the mortgage fraud at Bank of America and Wells Fargo, for example), I’ll take precedent wherever we can get it.
For the trials to actually be effective and serve as a deterrent to Wall Street CEOs, they will have to ultimately put employees in jail. Fortunately, Holder is now saying that prison is on the table. Seeing a few cronies behind bars might prompt other executives to start seeing their misconduct as a legitimate crime rather than merely a “business risk.”
Overall, I’m still wary that Holder’s pledge is yet another case of “saying the right thing while doing the opposite” that the Obama administration is known for. Will criminal banks finally be prosecuted? I’ll believe it when I see it… but, in this case, I would love nothing more than to be proven wrong.
Important Message: Please Read
For 25 years, Truthout has survived by publishing impactful investigative journalism and analysis; distributing full editions 365 days a year; and building a community of readers who support us with small, hard-earned donations.
Eighty percent of our $3 million yearly budget comes from small donors alone. Of those, 8,000 readers support us with monthly donations. Back in 2018, when Facebook decided to suppress the circulation of posts made by organizations, thereby cutting readers off from seeing many articles shared by the news organizations they had intentionally decided to follow, Truthout’s total traffic declined by 40 percent, as nearly all of our traffic from that platform disappeared.
As Google plans to roll out its new AI search bar, providing shoddy AI summaries instead of directing readers to our site, the consequences promise to be even more explosive. Google Search is our single largest source of traffic; it’s the route by which 27 percent of our readers find us. If even half of that 27 percent disappears, it will have a devastating impact on our journalism.
The entire journalism ecosystem will shoulder this blow, particularly independent publishers and news sites that depend on traffic and aren’t bankrolled by large corporations. If you can support Truthout with a donation today, you can help us resist the inevitability of Big Tech’s AI takeover. Please give today.