Elon Musk, the owner of X (formerly known as Twitter) may have cost the company tens of millions of dollars in lost advertising revenue due to his recent comments endorsing an antisemitic and racist conspiracy theory, internal documents show.
According to The New York Times, these documents find that the social media platform could lose as much as $75 million from advertising by the end of this year, with large companies like Apple, IBM and Disney pulling ads and others like Airbnb, Amazon, Coca-Cola, Microsoft and Netflix cutting back, pausing, or considering stopping their advertising campaigns on the platform.
The documents suggest that the company is struggling even more with revenue than previously reported, more than a year after Musk bought the company. The company has already reportedly been losing a large amount of ad revenue after the company made moves like removing user verification from the platform and seemingly easing up dramatically on moderation, which some reports have found have allowed a deluge of hateful content to flourish.
The Times report comes after Musk endorsed a version of the virulently hateful “great replacement theory” in tweets earlier this month.
In a post on November 15, an X user wrote, “Jewish communities have been pushing the exact kind of dialectical hatred against whites that they claim to want people to stop using against them. I’m deeply disinterested in giving the tiniest shit now about western Jewish populations coming to the disturbing realization that those hordes of minorities that support flooding their country don’t exactly like them too much.”
Musk agreed with this post in a reply, saying, “You have said the actual truth.” He followed up by saying that “The [Anti-Defamation League] unjustly attacks the majority of the West, despite the majority of the West supporting the Jewish people and Israel. This is because they cannot, by their own tenets, criticize the minority groups who are their primary threat. It is not right and needs to stop.” (A leader of the ADL, a vehemently Zionist organization, initially criticized Musk for the comment but turned around and defended him just two days later when Musk went on to denounce the anti-Zionist movement.)
Musk’s comments were widely and strongly condemned, with some commentators noting that it was one of the most openly antisemitic comments that the powerful right-wing billionaire has made in public. However, the posts may not have been entirely surprising, as Musk has been making other comments in recent months that have also hinted at his support of great replacement theory.
The initial user’s post, as well as Musk’s follow up about the “threat” of “minority groups,” perpetuate a bunk conspiracy theory that Jewish and non-white communities are threatening to destroy and replace white populations in countries that have historically been majority-white. The theory has deep roots in white supremacy, and has become more popular among the right in recent years as the Republican Party has spiraled further into fascist, Christian nationalist extremism.
At the same time, Musk has embroiled X in a legal battle with media watchdog group Media Matters for America after it published a short report purporting that advertisers have had their content displayed next to content by neo-Nazis, like those endorsing Hitler or the Nazi party. The report showed screenshots of ads from Apple, IBM, and other companies whose content had allegedly appeared next to such content.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.