An editor for a prominent newspaper in Germany has resigned in protest after the paper published an op-ed in which billionaire Elon Musk endorsed a far right political party.
Earlier this month, Musk signaled his support for Alternative for Germany (AfD) ahead of elections set to be held in that country in February.
AfD is widely recognized as a reactionary political party, emphasizing anti-immigration policies, particularly against Muslim migrants. Leaders of the party have frequently espoused racist and antisemitic statements, and have pushed for a return to a German “identity” — echoing rhetoric peddled by leaders of the Nazi Party during the mid-20th century.
AfD has also called for changing how Nazism is viewed historically within Germany. The party has suggested, for example, that monuments, schools and museums depicting the horrors of the Nazi regime, including the Holocaust, be altered, with one AfD party leader minimizing the atrocities perpetrated by the Nazis as “just a speck of bird’s muck.” Other leaders have outright denied that the Holocaust even occurred.
“Only the AfD can save Germany,” Musk wrote in a post on X, the social media site formerly known as Twitter.
This past weekend, the billionaire elaborated on his views, writing an op-ed once again endorsing AfD as his choice to lead the country.
The AfD is “the last spark of hope” for Germany, Musk claimed in the opinion pages of Welt am Sonntag, the newspaper in question, adding that he believed only that party can “lead the country into a future where economic prosperity, cultural integrity and technological innovation.”
Musk also mischaracterized AfD’s far right views, describing depictions of the party as “right-wing extremist” as being “false,” citing a single example of a member of the party having a same-sex partner.
“Does that sound like Hitler to you?” Musk asked in the op-ed, disregarding the fact that the AfD opposes marriage equality in Germany.
Musk’s op-ed was run alongside another, from the incoming editor-in-chief of Welt Jan Philipp Burgard. However, while that opinion piece expressed disagreement with Musk, it was gentle in condemning his endorsement of AfD.
“Musk’s diagnosis is correct, but his therapeutic approach, that only the AfD can save Germany, is fatally wrong,” Burgard’s op-ed stated.
Several journalists working for Welt expressed their anger to higher-ups at the paper for allowing Musk’s op-ed to run. Eva Marie Kogel, who until last week served as the publication’s opinion editor, resigned in protest of the decision to run the op-ed.
“I always enjoyed heading the opinion section of WELT … Today, an article by Elon Musk appeared in Welt am Sonntag,” Kogel wrote on X. “I handed in my resignation yesterday after it went to print.”
Kogel received accolades on social media for taking a stand against the paper.
“I hope that Eva Marie Kogel will find a good home elsewhere and receive the support she deserves. Her integrity and courage deserve to be recognized,” German journalist Katharina Lotter wrote on Bluesky.
“Respect for Eva Marie Kogel, previously head of the opinion section at WELT,” Der Spiegel journalist Oliver Das Gupta wrote.
“Thank you, Eva Marie Kogel. May many more follow your example and walk upright into the new year,” author Katja Diehl said.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.