Honest, paywall-free news is rare. Please support our boldly independent journalism with a donation of any size.
An analysis from The Associated Press demonstrates that, since 2022, there have been more than 100 instances where pregnant people in medical distress, who sought help from hospitals and emergency rooms across the country, were turned away from treatment or treated negligently.
The year the analysis starts from is significant, as the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in the middle of 2022, ending federal abortion rights protections that had been in place for nearly half a century. Most of the life-threatening situations within the analysis could have been solved by providing a person with an abortion, rather than subjecting them to harrowing conditions.
The figure is possibly higher than 100 individuals detrimentally affected, as the analysis only includes documented cases of negligence and refusal of service for dozens of people — many more unreported instances could very well exist.
According to the analysis, people who were experiencing complications with their pregnancies suffered life-threatening issues, such as going into septic shock after their fetus had died or after being refused treatment for ectopic pregnancies by their physicians. The analysis also documented instances where pregnant people were forced to miscarry in public restrooms rather than under the supervision of medical professionals.
The patients “were turned away or sent home while in active labor, bleeding or leaking amniotic fluid,” said Amanda Seitz, the author of The Associated Press article that detailed the analysis.
The analysis noted that states with anti-abortion laws weren’t the only ones with questionable records. One documented case occurred in California, a state that purports to be an abortion sanctuary, when a pregnant woman required a blood transfusion after waiting for several hours in the ER to be treated for her ectopic pregnancy.
The Biden administration has issued guidance that requires federally funded hospitals to provide an abortion when it is required to save a person’s life. However, doctors and physicians in several states are reluctant to do so due to fears of being prosecuted by state agencies under vague laws that do not define what a life-saving situation is. Texas is also challenging that federal guideline.
Abortion rights advocates believe that these states’ physicians need to be more proactive in determining who is eligible for an abortion under these standards.
“As fearful as hospitals and doctors are of running afoul of these state abortion bans, they also need to be concerned about running afoul of federal law,” said Marc Hearron, attorney for the Center for Reproductive Rights.
Strict abortion bans, such as those in Texas, harm pregnant people, including those who want to give birth because the exceptions to the bans, which in theory give consideration to people who face life-threatening situations, are so vague that doctors don’t dare test the waters for fear of prosecution. These exceptions are so vague, they are “virtually meaningless,” said Sonia Suter, a law professor at Washington University, speaking to openDemocracy about the issue earlier this year.
“What’s the magnitude of the risk that the law requires? What’s the probability of harm? How imminent must it be?” Suter questioned, adding:
The vagueness of these laws is a feature, not a bug. The vague exceptions allow a layperson to say ‘oh, the state cares about women’. But the state doesn’t care.
A terrifying moment. We appeal for your support.
In the last weeks, we have witnessed an authoritarian assault on communities in Minnesota and across the nation.
The need for truthful, grassroots reporting is urgent at this cataclysmic historical moment. Yet, Trump-aligned billionaires and other allies have taken over many legacy media outlets — the culmination of a decades-long campaign to place control of the narrative into the hands of the political right.
We refuse to let Trump’s blatant propaganda machine go unchecked. Untethered to corporate ownership or advertisers, Truthout remains fearless in our reporting and our determination to use journalism as a tool for justice.
But we need your help just to fund our basic expenses. Over 80 percent of Truthout’s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors.
Truthout has launched a fundraiser to add 500 new monthly donors in the next 9 days. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger one-time gift, Truthout only works with your support.