Skip to content Skip to footer

Consumer Protection Bureau Releases Payday Lending Rule, Calls for Credit Union-Style Services

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Director Richard Cordray touted alternatives to payday lending Thursday.

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau building in Washington, DC. (Photo: Ted Eytan; Edited: LW / TO)

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Director Richard Cordray touted existing alternatives to payday lending on Thursday, as the agency released long-anticipated rules to curtail abusive loansharking.

Cordray described the so-called “small-dollar” credit market as fundamentally broken, and said he hoped the proposed regulations would push the financial industry toward less predatory practices.

“We are not intending to disrupt existing lending by community banks and credit unions that have found efficient and effective ways to make small-dollar loans to consumers that do not lead to debt traps or high rates of failure,” he said. “We want to encourage other lenders to follow their model.”

Cordray made the remarks at an unveiling of the rules in Kansas City, Mo.

The rules, which had been preceded by years of Congressionally-mandated agency studies, would prohibit payday lenders from issuing certain types of shot-term credit without conducting any prior checks on a borrower’s ability to repay.

Loans that require borrowers to put up their car as collateral would be barred, for example, if the lender did not first conduct due diligence. A study released last month by the CFPB found that 20 percent of so-called “auto title” borrowers end up losing their car.

Lenders would not, however, need to means-test a borrower if they adhere to National Credit Union Administration standards on payday alternatives. The federal credit union regulator allows “payday alternative loans” with interest rates capped at 28 percent and application fees limited to $20.

“This option would be available to all lenders on the same basis and not just to federal credit unions,” Cordray noted.

The new regulations would also limit lenders’ ability to “roll over” debt — a practice that sees borrowers mired in a cycle of debt that often lasts months.

“More than half of all payday loans are made to borrowers in loan sequences of ten loans or more,” Cordray said. “For borrowers who are paid weekly or bi-weekly, one-fifth of these loans are in sequences of 20 loans or more.”

He also said the industry “depend[s] on a substantial percentage of borrowers being unable to repay the loan and borrowing again and again at high interest rates.”

The CFPB says that a typical payday loan interest rate is about 390 percent. High interest short-term loans are currently allowed in 36 states, where there are 16,000 payday lending outlets.

Lawmakers from Florida are currently trying to legislate a loophole to CFPB payday lending rules, if a state adopts a regulatory regime similar to the one that exists in Florida. It allows lenders to charge interest rates in excess of 300 percent.

Though Republicans have led the charge, it has been heartily backed by Democrats that receive substantial support from the industry, including Reps. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz (D-Fla.), Alcee Hastings (D-Fla.), and Patrick Murphy (D-Fla.).

Liberal defenders of payday lenders have claimed the rule will effectively kill an industry that tailors to the poor. Wasserman-Schultz office said in March that Florida’s regulatory regime is “preserving access to credit in underserved communities.”

In response to efforts, one non-profit highlighted campaign donations to Wasserman-Schultz from payday lenders, and nicknamed her “Debt Trap Debbie.”

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), one of the most prominent CFPB advocates, celebrated Thursday’s announcement by hitting out on Twitter at payday lender allies in both parties.

“Payday lending is a $7B/yr industry. That buys a lot of influence in Congress — not just with the GOP, but also some Democrats,” she said.

Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn

Dear Truthout Community,

If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.

We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.

Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.

There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.

After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?

It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.

We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.

We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.

Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.

We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.

With love, rage, and solidarity,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy