The Oklahoma Supreme Court has overturned a contract between the state and a religious school, ruling that a proposed charter school agreement is unconstitutional due to the institution’s stated plan to use government funding provided to evangelize students.
Oklahoma’s Statewide Virtual Charter School Board voted 3-2 last year to approve the Catholic Archdiocese of Oklahoma for the St. Isidore of Seville Virtual Charter School. Notably, that vote was not without its own controversy — appointees to the board are made by the governor and the state legislature, and the deciding vote in favor of giving St. Isidore’s charter school status came from someone appointed just days before the vote took place.
The issue of granting a religious school charter school status has split Republican lawmakers in the state, with Gov. Kevin Stitt and state Superintendent of Public Schools Ryan Walters backing the idea, but state Attorney General Gentner Drummond viewing it as unconstitutional. Drummond argued against giving St. Isidore’s charter status before the state Supreme Court on behalf of parents, faith leaders and educational groups who had sued to stop the school’s contract with the state from moving forward.
In a 6-2 decision by the state’s highest court, with one justice recusing from the matter, the justices said the proposed charter school violated the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment regulations on government endorsement of religion. The charter school status for St. Isidore, which had stated clearly that it intended to teach religious themes using state funds, also violated state law, the justices noted.
“Under Oklahoma law, a charter school is a public school. As such, a charter school must be nonsectarian,” said Justice James Winchester, writing in the opinion of the court.
Entertaining the notion that the state could use taxpayer funds to help the religious entity open a school would be “a slippery slope,” Winchester stated, adding:
St. Isidore will evangelize the Catholic faith as part of its school curriculum while sponsored by the State. This State’s establishment of a religious charter school violates Oklahoma statutes, the Oklahoma Constitution, and the Establishment Clause.
“The St. Isidore Contract violates state and federal law and is unconstitutional,” Winchester said in the opinion, ordering the contract between the state and the school to be rescinded.
The school has vowed to continue pursuing charter school status, and it’s likely the matter will be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.
The case is being closely watched by religious activists on the far right, who are curious if the current conservative majority on the federal Supreme Court is willing to overturn decades of precedent regarding restrictions on government spending for religious purposes. The Court has previously ruled on two matters over the past four years regarding religious schools, finding that states cannot discriminate against religious institutions if they allocate funds to private schools in general.
The ruling from the Oklahoma Supreme Court was lauded by groups opposed to using taxpayer monies to fund religious causes.
“The Oklahoma Supreme Court’s decision safeguards public education and upholds the separation of religion and government,” read a joint statement from Americans United for Separation of Church and State, the American Civil Liberties Union, the Education Law Center, and other like-minded organizations. “Charter schools are public schools that must be secular and serve all students. St. Isidore of Seville Catholic Virtual School, which plans to discriminate against students, families and staff and indoctrinate students into one religion, cannot operate as a public charter school.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.