Mervyn King, governor of the Bank of England, has crossed the line by acting as cheerleader for the Conservative Party’s policies of making deep cuts in public spending — cuts that have affected everything from university tuition fees to tax breaks for families.
“The last thing you ever want is for the Bank of England to be drawn into the political arena,” Ed Balls, the shadow chancellor and a spokesman for the opposition Labour Party, told the Financial Times in an interview on Feb. 17. Mr. Balls has criticized the governor for publicly backing the harsh austerity policies, which Mr. Balls says could spark a double-dip recession and more unemployment in Britain.
He maintains that Mr. King’s stance is politically motivated. “Central bank governors have to be very careful about tying themselves too closely to fiscal strategies, especially when they are extreme and are making their job on monetary policy more complicated,” he said.
Mr. Balls is right; Mr. King has been busy defending the Conservative government’s economic strategy lately and has urged officials to stick to their plans for further cuts. The governor is wrong on economics — spending cuts are the wrong policy for a still-depressed economy — but that’s not key to the argument. Rather, the point is that if an independent central bank is to retain the public trust, the people running that bank have to be careful to stay above the political fray.
Mr. King’s politicking recalls the actions of Alan Greenspan, chairman of the United States Federal Reserve from 1987 to 2006, who was a stern advocate of fiscal discipline — until a Republican, George W. Bush, was in the White House, and Mr. Greenspan suddenly declared that the United States needed to cut taxes in 2001 to prevent too rapid a reduction in national debt.
It’s very sad to see Mr. King going down the same path. Now, I was critical of Mr. Greenspan back when he was still a god in the American pantheon — when he supported not only tax cuts but, in 2005, also supported the privatization of Social Security. I have many failings, but an unwillingness to criticize powerful people isn’t one of them.
That said, some may wonder why I have not expressed similar disapproval of Ben S. Bernanke, the current Fed chairman.
There is a good reason: he’s not as bad an actor. You can argue that he has made bad decisions, and also that he has been too easy on the banks. You can even fault Mr. Bernanke for brushing off warnings in the early part of the last decade about the troubled housing market in the United States.
But he hasn’t engaged in the kind of unacceptable raw partisan advocacy that Mr. Greenspan did then and Mr. King is now.
Backstory: Britain’s Austerity Test
Central bankers generally try to stay out of politics. So it is surprising that Mervyn King, a governor at the Bank of England, has been speaking publicly in favor of Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne’s deficit-reduction plans.
Mr. King’s endorsement of the British government’s austerity program under Prime Minister David Cameron has drawn both criticism and support from officials on either side of the debate. The critics, led by shadow chancellor Ed Balls of the Labour Party, say that the central bank’s current involvement in fiscal policies, especially politically controversial ones like harsh spending cuts, risks the bank’s reputation for objectivity. They add that Mr. King is supporting fiscal consolidation plans that might push the nation toward a double-dip recession.
Others, including David Cameron, Britain’s prime minister, find Mr. King’s support for austerity timely and necessary, and Mr. Cameron has condemned critics’ attacks on Mr. King’s pro-government stance.
At the center of the debate is the question of what course of action the government and central bank officials should take to stem rising inflation in Britain. Consumer prices rose 4 percent in January, to their highest levels in two years, and Britain has missed its inflation target of 2 percent for the last 14 consecutive months. Price increases on goods and services mean that there is tremendous pressure on the Bank of England’s Monetary Policy Committee to raise interest rates.
Mr. King blames the overall rise in consumer costs on higher prices of basic commodities and increased sales taxes, a temporary trend that he says will reverse in 2012. Tightening interest rates now, he says, might completely stifle Britain’s still-weak economy.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy