The Trump administration will withdraw from a post-Cold War treaty that enabled signatories to keep tabs on member nations’ arms developments.
The Open Skies Treaty was negotiated in 1992 by the administration of President George H. W. Bush with Russia shortly after the fall of the Soviet Union. The treaty, which involves many other nations in Europe and Canada, allows each member state the right to fly reconnaissance planes over each other to provide assurances that no country is increasing its arms production in preparation for war.
The Trump administration is reportedly planning to justify its exit from the agreement over accusations that Russia wasn’t adhering to the accord.
“You reach a point at which you need to say enough is enough. The United States cannot keep participating in this treaty if Russia is going to violate it with impunity,” Marshall Billingslea, the president’s recently-named special envoy for Arms Control, said.
It’s possible that President Donald Trump may also have personal reasons for leaving the treaty. In 2017, Trump was reportedly upset over the fact that Russian planes flew over one of his golf courses in Bedminster, New Jersey.
On Friday, “the U.S. will submit notice of its decision to withdraw from the Treaty on Open Skies,” Secretary of State Mike Pompeo announced. Other member nations allied to the U.S. were informed of the decision to leave the treaty during the past week.
Pompeo left open the possibility that the U.S. would remain in the treaty, but only if Russia returned “to full compliance,” he said.
This marks the third major international agreement that Trump has exited during his tenure as president. Two years ago, the president removed the U.S. from the Iran nuclear accord, which was negotiated and implemented during the Obama administration. Last year, Trump also left the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty.
It’s possible that Trump’s departure from the Open Skies Treaty could signal his intention to eventually leave the New START agreement, which limits deployed nuclear missiles to 1,550 each for Russia and the U.S.
Many on social media expressed disgust and doubts about the decision to leave the Open Skies Treaty. Gen. Michael Hayden, who was head of the CIA primarily during the administration of President George W. Bush (but also for one month under President Barack Obama), registered his misgivings in an ableist tweet shortly after the plans for departure were announced.
Others suggested the move would lead to a new era of spying and increased distrust between the two nations.
“The likely effect” from exiting the treaty will be “U.S. allies having less information on Russian military activity, [and] a resurgence of espionage activity between Russia and the US,” DefenseOne tech editor Patrick Tucker said.
Steven Pifer, an arms control expert, expressed doubts on the legality over the decision to leave the treaty.
“Looks like #Trump decision to withdraw from #OpenSkiesTreaty is also [a] violation of US law. Sec. 1234 of FY 2020 National Defense Authorization Act requires notification to Congress 120 days before notification of intention to withdraw,” he wrote in a tweet.
Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Connecticut), a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, also expressed alarm at Trump’s decision to withdraw from the treaty.
“Trump is abdicating American leadership in arms control & so many other areas of international relations — undermining our own national security & defense,” Blumenthal wrote.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy