Skip to content Skip to footer

Black Lives Matter: Let the Students Speak, Let Her Teach

I thank you for following your educational mission and engaging in this humanistic endeavor while valuing “intelligent dissent [over] passive agreement,” to quote Bertrand Russell.

This is Dan Falcone’s letter to a teacher named Marilyn Zuniga. Zuniga’s students apparently wanted to write Mumia Abu-Jamal “get well” letters after learning he had fallen ill. The students knew of him from a Black history lesson on the topic of civil rights. Zuniga was disciplined for the activity and suspended without pay. Since the suspension, the students’ rights to be facilitated by the instructor has received support from the dean of the University of San Francisco’s School of Education, Kevin Kumashiro; world-renowned public intellectual Noam Chomsky; professor and social commentator Marc Lamont Hill; and Baruch College history professor Johanna Fernandez.

Dear Ms. Zuniga,

I wanted to thank you for your thoughtfulness, creativity, courage and careful attention to detail in theprocess of having young co-learners write get well cards to Mumia Abu-Jamal. The story of the fallen officer Faulkner is undoubtedly horrible, awful and sad. I have incredible sympathy for him and his family. I have close friends associated with members of the Philadelphia police and it is a truly sensitive and delicate matter.

Of course your sympathy, knowledge and foresight to help students actively participate and engage with goodwill to an activist who lives a life of resistance is noteworthy. I was saddened to see that you were suspended and removed from the classroom. Your school officials may have impressed certain cultural managers in Saudi Arabia, North Korea and China, but this should not happen in the United States, where expression rights are in fact unique in the world. I do realize that since the 2005 Supreme Court case of Garcetti vs. Ceballos, school employees have seen their unpopular speech rights gradually dismantled.

Across our nation’s schools I see students exposed to tremendous amounts of admiration for militarized law enforcement, politicians, veterans and members of active duty. The fascination with technology that lends itself to privatization and incarceration is also stunning. Other students join ROTC and have a fondness for military sacrifice and stories of valor including an affinity for the recent film, American Sniper.

The financial outpouring, educational support, and intellectual investment devoted to such thought exercises and entertainment formats involving aggression, invasion, occupation and killing is unflinching, unwavering and alarming in this country. It is all aided and abetted by adults. As a separate and asymmetrical issue, if students were to write letters to Taya Kyle to express sympathy forthe loss of her husband, for example, no school should ever be allowed to punish that teacher either.

At the same time, it is illiberal, immoral and hypocritical for schools, generation upon generation, in allowing military recruiters to enter and recruit a certain demographic of students. This is often done while falsifying how much money for college a person will get coupled with a second lie – where you will go after basic training. In actuality, the Enlistment Contract Sheet Section (C. h.) has the words that give the service rights to apply assets where duty is needed.

I find it sad but telling that simple yet profound letters to a sick individual could reach such violent opposition. Mumia Abu-Jamal was essentially detested by the local politicians and the police chief for years. He was ultimately failed by the legal system and he never received his basic rights of due process. Aside from not being Mirandized properly, no effort was made to establish a neutral jurisdiction. Abu-Jamal, deeply versed in law, was able to document and clearly identify perjury, doctored evidence and the coaching of witnesses. Yes, Officer Faulkner should not have died, but Abu-Jamal should not die nor decay in jail without a legitimate trial either. It’s rather simple.

Writing to Abu-Jamal is at best a chance to seek a better understanding for the legal ramifications, political phenomena and socio-historical contexts of the case and similar current affairs. For young people to start searching for these answers does not attempt to justify the death of a police officer, nor show insensitivity to his family.

At the very least, writing to Abu-Jamal is a chance for younger students to do what they often do best, empathize and intuit.Judith Butler recently wrote that the slogan “Black Lives Matter” [too] is something that should be obviously true, but apparently is not.

In short, I thank you for following your educational mission and engaging in this humanistic endeavor while valuing “intelligent dissent [over] passive agreement,” to quote Bertrand Russell.

Sincerely,
Dan Falcone

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.