On July 29, Congressional Progressive Caucus Co-Chair Keith Ellison did something unique for a member of Congress. He published an op-ed in The Washington Post calling for ending the economic blockade on 1.8 million Palestinians in Gaza, noting that most of the victims of the blockade were women and children.
As of this writing, Representative Ellison stands alone among members of Congress in calling for the economic blockade on civilians in Gaza to end.
“Every schoolboy knows” that the so-called “pro-Israel lobby,” i.e. the lobby pushing for US policy on any issue of interest to the Israeli government to be determined to the greatest extent possible by the Israeli Likud party, has tremendous influence in Washington and especially in Congress. The generally accepted shorthand for this pro-Likud lobby is “AIPAC.” (It’s common practice to use the term “AIPAC” to refer to the pro-Likud lobby generically, including such groups as the (so-called) Anti-Defamation League (ADL) and the American Jewish Committee (AJC), rather than merely to the activities of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee per se, much as one uses the term “Xerox” to mean “copy.” I will follow this practice here, using the term “AIPAC” to refer to the pro-Likud lobby more generally.)
But here is a crucial fact that is largely unacknowledged: Until now, there is no consistent, strategic, coordinated effort by DC-focused reformists to reduce the harm caused by AIPAC to US policy on the Israel-Palestine issue, with the goal of opening political space for concrete measures to support a realistic diplomatic resolution of issues related to the Israel-Palestine conflict, similar to the coordinated efforts that have opened political space for diplomatic efforts to resolve the US-Iran conflict over Iran’s nuclear program. There is a vacuum of pragmatic, reformist leadership to try to limit AIPAC’s destructive influence on US policy towards Israel-Palestine.
If there were not such a vacuum, Keith Ellison would not be standing alone.
On the one hand, there are reformist groups. Unfortunately, at this juncture, the historic fulcrum of these groups appears to be too obsessed with getting the approval of pro-AIPAC Jewish communal institutions to be relied on to consistently lead a reformist effort that moves the ball forward in Washington on Israel-Palestine. On the other hand, there are non-reformist groups on the left, which are incapable of leading strategically because they are obsessed with quixotic fantasies of cutting US military aid to Israel, or of opposing AIPAC “yay Israel” resolutions that are unstoppable. These so-called “strategies” don’t pass the minimal “one member of Congress” test for a non-quixotic DC strategy. The “one member of Congress” test for a non-quixotic DC strategy is: Could you get one member of Congress to lead it? If not, then you’re not on the playing field of Washington, and have no hope of getting there.
Quixotic efforts are counterproductive over the long term to engagement and mobilization. If you mobilize people for a quixotic strategy, they’re likely to be discouraged when the strategy predictably goes down in flames. They’re likely to conclude that engagement is useless, but it was the pursuit of a quixotic strategy that caused their demoralization, not engagement per se. When people win, they do more. When they lose, they do less. It’s a moral responsibility of a strategist to try to create opportunities for people to win.
Pushing to end the economic blockade of 1.8 million Palestinian human beings in Gaza is passing the “one member of Congress” test, because Rep. Keith Ellison is in the house. So here’s a strategy that could potentially be on the playing field of Washington right now: Let’s try to get other members of Congress to #StandWithKeith in favor of ending the economic blockade on 1.8 million Palestinians in Gaza.
We have to start somewhere. Where should we begin?
Twenty-seven members of the House have two things in common:
1) like Keith Ellison, they signed the July 2013 Dent-Price letter backing the Obama administration’s diplomatic engagement with Iran, in defiance of AIPAC, and
2) like Keith Ellison, they are members of the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC).
Why is this group of 27 members of Congress so special?
When Ellison sent a letter on July 18, calling for intensifying US diplomacy to end the war in Gaza, two-thirds of the signers were CBC members (like Ellison) who had signed the Dent-Price letter. Twenty-eight (67 percent) of the 42 House members of the CBC (including Ellison) signed the Dent-Price letter. So, while CBC signers of the Dent-Price letter comprised 6 percent of the House, they comprised 67 percent of the signers of the Ellison cease-fire letter. That’s why these 27 members of the House are special.
Here they are, with their districts and some geography:
Karen Bass (CA-37) (Los Angeles/Culver City)
Sanford D. Bishop, Jr. (GA-02) (SW Georgia, Columbus-Cordele-Bainbridge)
André Carson (IN-07) (Indianapolis)
Donna M. Christensen (VI) (Virgin Islands)
Wm. Lacy Clay (MO-01) (St. Louis)
Emanuel Cleaver, II (MO-05) (Kansas City)
James E. Clyburn (SC-06) (SE South Carolina, Charleston-Columbia)
John Conyers, Jr. (MI-13) (Detroit)
Elijah E. Cummings (MD-07) (Baltimore)
Danny K. Davis (IL-07) (Chicago-Oak Park)
Donna F. Edwards (MD-04) (Prince George’s, Montgomery, Anne Arundel Counties)
Chaka Fattah (PA-02) (Philadelphia)
Alcee L. Hastings (FL-20) (Miami)
Sheila Jackson Lee (TX-18) (Houston)
Eddie Bernice Johnson (TX-30) (Dallas)
Hank Johnson (GA-04) (Atlanta-Decatur, DeKalb County)
Robin Kelly (IL-02) (Chicago-Kankakee)
Barbara Lee (CA-13) (Berkeley-Oakland)
John Lewis (GA-05) (Atlanta)
Gregory W. Meeks (NY-06) (Queens)
Gwen Moore (WI-04) (Milwaukee)
Eleanor Holmes Norton (DC) (Washington, D.C.)
Donald M. Payne, Jr. (NJ-10) (Newark)
Charles B. Rangel (NY-13) (Upper Manhattan)
Bobby L. Rush (IL-01) (Chicago-Joliet)
Robert C. “Bobby” Scott (VA-03) (Newport News-Norfolk-Richmond)
Maxine Waters (CA-43) (South Los Angeles County)
Roughly 6 percent of Americans are represented by one of these 27 members of the House. If you belong to this 6 percent, then you are special, because they are special.
If you are a member of this 6 percent group of special Americans, then I encourage you to call your representative (you can look up their phone number here) and urge them to make a public statement now in favor of lifting the blockade on 1.8 million human beings in Gaza. Time is pressing, because negotiations are happening in Cairo right now that are likely to have a decisive impact on whether and when the blockade is ended.
If you belong to the other 94 percent, then I encourage you to look at the list of 27 districts above and send the link to this post to someone you know who lives in one of those 27 districts.
Let’s form an ad-hoc “pressure group” to try to turn the CBC in favor of ending the economic blockade of 1.8 million Palestinians in Gaza. If we succeed, yay for us. If we fail, we won’t fail because we chose a quixotic strategy; we’ll fail because we couldn’t recruit enough pragmatic engagers to carry it out.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy