Skip to content Skip to footer

Biden Says He’s “Practically” Declared Climate Emergency — But He Hasn’t

“Practically speaking, Biden has devastated communities and wildlife,” one frustrated climate advocate said.

President Joe Biden waves toward visitors watching the departure as he walks to Marine One on the South Lawn of the White House July 28, 2023, in Washington, D.C.

Climate advocates are frustrated after President Joe Biden waved away the myriad calls for him to declare a climate emergency on Wednesday, refusing to use the full extent of his executive powers to combat the climate crisis.

When asked about calls for him to declare a climate emergency in an interview with the Weather Channel, Biden falsely said that he has “already done that,” citing land conservation efforts, the Paris Accords and the Inflation Reduction Act. Later, he clarified that he has not actually declared a climate emergency, but said that, “practically speaking,” he has.

The fact remains, however, that Biden has not declared a climate emergency, much to the chagrin of the thousands of climate groups, experts and members of his own party who have called on him to do so. Though White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said that Biden was referring to his invocation of the Defense Production Act (DPA) for clean energy manufacturing, the actions that Biden and the White House are referring to still do not add up to a declaration of climate emergency.

Climate advocates have time and again called for a climate emergency declaration, which would unlock a wide range of authority and funding that Biden could use to combat the crisis, like banning crude oil exports and halting offshore drilling.

Advocates were deeply frustrated by Biden’s comment.

“President Biden, if I may presume to speak on behalf of climate scientists, parents, young people, and other species such as corals and trees, I beg you — I literally beg you — to formally declare a climate emergency. Too few realize it yet, but we now risk losing everything,” NASA climate scientist Peter Kalmus, who emphasized that he was not speaking on behalf of his employer, said in an email to Truthout. Kalmus recently wrote an essay for The Guardian sounding the alarm about the Biden administration’s continued pursuit of fossil fuels and the need for a climate emergency declaration.

“More fossil fuels means more heat, more disasters, more food shortages, more instability, more peril. I know it’s not easy, but please be the visionary leader humanity needs. Lead us out of peril, not further into it,” Kalmus continued. “Start by declaring a climate emergency, for real, and don’t stop there.”

Though Biden touted actions like the U.S.’s emissions reduction pledge for the Paris Climate Accords — which the U.S. is on track to fall far short of anyway — the Biden administration has also been approving oil and gas drilling at an even faster rate than President Donald Trump did, and has been approving “carbon bomb” projects to open up even more land to drilling.

Meanwhile, the White House has confirmed that Biden will not declare a climate emergency — yet another knife in the side of the climate movement on top of a pile of broken promises like his pledge for no new drilling on federal lands, “period, period, period.”

“Biden has, in fact, failed to declare a climate emergency under the National Emergencies Act, failed to harness his executive powers, and failed to take lifesaving action to end fossil fuels,” Center for Biological Diversity Climate Law Institute Director Kassie Siegel said in a statement.

“Practically speaking, Biden has devastated communities and wildlife by backing disastrous carbon bombs from Alaska to Appalachia. But the president can still become the leader we need by declaring a climate emergency for real,” Siegel said. “The world is waiting for him to use all his emergency and ordinary powers to phase out the fossil fuels broiling our planet.”

Jim Walsh, policy director for Food and Water Watch, which has joined calls for Biden to declare a climate emergency along with groups like Center for Biological Diversity, also criticized Biden’s statement.

“If President Biden recognizes we have a climate emergency, he has a funny way of showing it. His administration continues to move in the wrong direction by expanding fossil fuel drilling and exports, while embracing industry carbon capture and offset schemes,” Walsh said in a statement to Truthout. “We need President Biden to declare a climate emergency and take meaningful action to quickly phase out fossil fuels, instead of giving the lip service to the climate crisis while making it worse.”

Biden has done this before. Last year, Biden announced a series of measures to combat heat-related illnesses in the workplace, saying that the climate crisis is “an emergency, and I will look at it that way.” But despite that rhetoric, he stopped short of declaring an actual emergency at the time.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.