Skip to content Skip to footer

Biden Is Considering Deploying Thousands of Troops to Eastern Europe

Progressive analysts warn the deployment of U.S. troops would further inflame tensions — and risk war with Russia.

U.S. President Joe Biden and Russian President Vladimir Putin meet during the U.S.-Russia summit at Villa La Grange on June 16, 2021, in Geneva, Switzerland.

Truthout is an indispensable resource for activists, movement leaders and workers everywhere. Please make this work possible with a quick donation.

U.S. President Joe Biden is reportedly weighing a Pentagon proposal to deploy thousands of American troops to the Baltics and Eastern Europe as progressive anti-war analysts and activists warn such a move would further inflame tensions in the region — and risk a full-blown war with Russia.

The New York Times reported Sunday that top U.S. Defense Department officials have “presented Mr. Biden with several options that would shift American military assets much closer to [Russian President Vladimir] Putin’s doorstep” after talks between U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken and Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov failed to produce a diplomatic breakthrough.

“The options include sending 1,000 to 5,000 troops to Eastern European countries, with the potential to increase that number tenfold if things deteriorate,” the Times noted. “Mr. Biden is expected to make a decision as early as this week.”

Reports of the plan came amid news that both the U.S. and United Kingdom are withdrawing diplomats’ families from Ukraine, citing potential “military action” against the country by Russia.

Russia has denied U.S. allegations that it is plotting an imminent invasion of Ukraine, a NATO ally that hopes to join the alliance — an ambition Russia sees as a major security threat. The U.S. has been pumping weapons into Ukraine for years, and in 2014 supported the violent overthrow of the country’s elected government. Currently, the U.S. has more than 150 “military advisers” in Ukraine, including Special Operations forces.

Ukraine Defense Minister Oleksii Reznikov announced via Twitter over the weekend that the nation had received a fresh batch of “more than 80 tons of weapons” from the U.S. and expects additional arms in the near future.

“This is not the end,” Reznikov wrote.

On Sunday, Russia dismissed an accusation — this time from the United Kingdom — that it intends to invade Ukraine and install a “puppet government” there.

“Stop spreading nonsense,” the Russian Foreign Ministry said in a statement, accusing NATO countries of “escalating tensions around Ukraine.”

The Times reported Sunday that the Biden administration is “now moving away from its do-not-provoke strategy” after previously “taking a restrained stance on Ukraine, out of fear of provoking Russia into invading.”

William Hartung, senior research fellow of the Quincy Institute, warned Monday that “even indirect intervention could cost billions, while increasing the risks of escalation in ways that could put U.S. personnel — and U.S. interests — in danger.”

“Perhaps the biggest risk is posed by the likely deployment of additional U.S. troops and contractors to help to train Ukrainian forces on using U.S.-origin systems, and to assist in maintaining them,” Hartung observed. “If any U.S. personnel end up on the front lines and are killed in the event of a Russian invasion, the stakes — and the prospects for escalation — will rise dramatically.”

Katrina vanden Heuvel, president of the American Committee for the U.S.-Russia Accord and publisher of The Nation, similarly argued that “if U.S. troops are there training Ukrainians, we may see American casualties.”

“That could lead to even more U.S. involvement and a potential and exceedingly dangerous quagmire,” she continued. “Ukraine demands a diplomatic and political resolution. A positive outcome would be the expansion of a new and demilitarized international security architecture in the region, and a moratorium on NATO expansion, along with international guarantees for Ukraine’s independence. May it be a bridge between East and West.”

“Any intervention now,” vanden Heuvel wrote, “would squander U.S. attention and resources on challenges posed by the pandemic, economic inequality, racial divisions, and catastrophic climate change.”

Important Message: Please Read

For 25 years, Truthout has survived by publishing impactful investigative journalism and analysis; distributing full editions 365 days a year; and building a community of readers who support us with small, hard-earned donations.

Eighty percent of our $3 million yearly budget comes from small donors alone. Of those, 8,000 readers support us with monthly donations. Back in 2018, when Facebook decided to suppress the circulation of posts made by organizations, thereby cutting readers off from seeing many articles shared by the news organizations they had intentionally decided to follow, Truthout’s total traffic declined by 40 percent, as nearly all of our traffic from that platform disappeared.

Now, Google has recently rolled out its AI search bar, providing AI summaries instead of directing readers to our site. Google Search is our single largest source of traffic; it’s the route by which nearly one third of our readers find us. Much like in 2018, a shocking 40 percent of our Google traffic has disappeared overnight.

It will not be easy for Truthout to shoulder this blow. Nor will it be easy for our peers and collaborators — news sites that depend on traffic and aren’t bankrolled by large corporations.

If you can support Truthout with a donation today, you can help us resist the AI onslaught. Please give today.