For the eighth time in history, the U.S. House of Representatives has voted to formalize an impeachment inquiry against a sitting president — this time, citing little compelling evidence.
In a vote that was wholly partisan, 221 Republicans backed a House resolution calling for a formal impeachment inquiry into President Joe Biden. All 212 Democrats in the chamber opposed the measure.
The inquiry was technically launched in September without a full vote, after then-Speaker of the House Kevin McCarthy (R-California) ordered the heads of three House committees to begin investigating Biden over still-unsubstantiated claims that he had aided his son’s business dealings or benefited from them himself as vice president of the Obama administration.
Formalizing the impeachment inquiry gives more political weight to those committees’ future requests for documents, witness testimonies and other evidence-gathering powers.
Impeachment inquiries are rare in American politics, generally occurring only after overwhelming evidence suggests that a president or other executive branch figure has engaged in malfeasance of some kind. However, this inquiry differs vastly from those in the past, as there is no concrete proof to back any of Republicans’ allegations, a point that many within the House GOP conference have readily admitted.
Still, the conference stood together, with all Republican members of the House voting to pass the measure.
Republicans are framing the vote as a procedural move rather than the significant action that it’s been portrayed as in the past, saying the formalized inquiry is needed in order to find evidence of wrongdoing — again, a process that goes in the opposite direction that past impeachment inquiries have gone.
Indeed, a case could be made that much of the evidence that has been gathered so far warrants dropping the inquiry that had already begun. Witnesses who have testified before Republicans, including Hunter Biden’s former business partners, have confirmed that the president didn’t engage in any actions that could be viewed as impeachable. And after viewing around 36,000 bank records belonging to the Bidens, Republicans have not found a “smoking gun” and have relied solely on innuendo to justify continuing their investigation against the president. They have claimed, for example, that loan repayments from Hunter Biden to Joe Biden, in order for the former to purchase a truck, were examples of money laundering from the Chinese government; the only evidence they provided backing that assertion is the fact that the younger Biden earned his income at the time from Chinese companies with connections to Beijing.
Those payments were made to Joe Biden at a time when he wasn’t in any government office.
Nevertheless, Republican lawmakers continue to insist that Biden’s actions are somehow worthy of impeachment, with Rep. James Comer (R-Kentucky), the chair of the House Oversight Committee and leader of the inquiry, stating that Biden “must be held accountable for his lies, corruption and obstruction.”
Notably, Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana) who brought the vote to the floor on Wednesday, did so on the fourth anniversary of him chastising Democrats for opening an inquiry against former President Donald Trump without any Republican support.
Some Democrats accused their Republican colleagues of only opening an impeachment inquiry against Biden to help Trump in their potential rematch election in 2024.
“We are here for one reason and one reason alone: Donald Trump demanded that Republicans impeach, so they are going to impeach,” Rep. Jim McGovern (D-Massachusetts) said prior to the vote, referring to Trump’s demands in August that GOP lawmakers impeach Biden even without an inquiry. “They are weaponizing and abusing impeachment, one of the most somber and serious things that Congress can do, to attack President Joe Biden.”
Biden has also condemned the vote by Republicans.
“Instead of doing anything to help make Americans’ lives better, [Republicans] are focused on attacking me with lies,” Biden said in his statement. “Instead of doing their job on the urgent work that needs to be done, they are choosing to waste time on this baseless political stunt.”
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment. We are presently looking for 350 new monthly donors in the next 6 days.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy