In a new interview, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-New York) has spoken out about the myriad societal causes behind the tragic death of Jordan Neely on a New York City subway last week, saying that his death was the direct result of policy decisions that left him vulnerable to people with a violent hatred of poor people.
Speaking with The Cut this week, Ocasio-Cortez said that the neoliberal policies put in place by New York City Mayor Eric Adams (D) are creating truly unsafe conditions for residents of the city — but not in the ways that the right-wingers defending Neely’s killer, Daniel Penny, may think.
The right has been callously claiming that Neely — who was reportedly shouting about his need for food and stability before he was choked to death by Penny last Monday — essentially deserved to die in order for other people on the subway car to feel safe. But, as Ocasio-Cortez pointed out, almost every working class person in the U.S. is “closer to Neely than we are to a billionaire,” due in large part to extremely economically precarious conditions for the working class.
“Jordan Neely was saying exactly what he needed, which was food. He narrated this tragedy himself. He said, ‘I’d rather be in jail than try to navigate what the city has become,’” she said. “Every single one of us is at the brink right now. Rents have skyrocketed to these absolutely extortionate prices. When housing prices go up, homelessness goes up. It’s not a grand mystery.”
Indeed, some of Neely’s last words, according to a witness, were about being fed up with his lack of food and shelter. “I don’t care if I die. I don’t care if I go to jail. I don’t have any food … I’m done,” Neely said, according to witness Juan Alberto Vazquez. His words were what seemed to have triggered Penny to place Neely in a chokehold that lasted 15 minutes, according to Vazquez.
Adams’s moves to strip the city’s homeless services bare and worsen conditions for people experiencing homelessness, reduce access to mental health and other public services, and increase criminalization by funneling money to the New York City Police Department have all created conditions for people like Neely to suffer, Ocasio-Cortez said. Meanwhile, fear mongering around crime by people like Adams has exacerbated the extremely negative public perception of poor people.
This is evident in part by Adams’s and other local Democratic leaders’ response to Neely’s killing. In the mayor’s statement last week, he appeared to blame Neely for his death. Adams said that “there were serious mental health issues in play” that could potentially create “dangerous situations” for people in the subway — despite the fact that there is no evidence that Neely was posing danger to anyone and that Vazquez has said that Neely wasn’t acting aggressively toward anyone in the subway car.
If the Adams administration were truly concerned about increasing public safety, Ocasio-Cortez emphasized, it would use “evidence-based policy” to help the people that it clearly and inhumanely views as a threat, rather than pushing them further into precarity.
“Jordan Neely was killed by public policy. He was killed by the demonizing of the poor by many of our leaders. He was killed by the same reluctance for people to see him as human that leaders are exhibiting right now, even in his death,” she said. “A safer city is one with fewer homeless people, not because they’ve been displaced but because they have been housed.”
Statements from people like Adams that appear to justify the violence that Penny unleashed will only lead to more violence, Ocasio-Cortez warned — perhaps similarly to the violence that activists protesting Neely’s death are currently facing by police.
“There’s a hypocrisy to the way many officials talk about public safety. All of these responses are acting as though Neely was the aggressor here, when he was the one who was murdered,” she said. “When you create a situation where harming a certain class of people may be excused, then we incentivize this kind of behavior. Anybody can point to anybody else and say, ‘Oh, well, I was scared of them.’”
“All of this has to do with race and class,” she said. “If the city just wants this to be a playground for the rich, that is the most dangerous outcome for all of us.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.