Amazon Echo devices, commonly referred to as “Alexa,” have been wrongly telling users that the 2020 presidential election was stolen.
The misinformation being disseminated by Alexa devices about the integrity of the 2020 election — in which Joe Biden defeated incumbent President Donald Trump — was first reported on by The Washington Post. The publication noted that it’s unknown how long the devices have been telling users false information.
Echo devices work by listening to a user’s question following prompting — typically the user saying the name “Alexa” out loud— and scouring the internet for information based on what was asked. The information the device sends back is not always accurate, and its responses are sometimes entirely irrelevant to the question that was posed.
As the Post’s reporting indicates, Echo devices can also sometimes send back misinformation about important historical events.
[embedded tweet]
Alexa has been responding to queries about the election by telling users that the presidential race was “stolen by a massive amount of election fraud,” and that the race was “notorious for many incidents of irregularities” among ballots in metropolitan areas — even though investigators have repeatedly debunked claims of widespread fraud. The device cited Rumble, a YouTube alternative that is often used by the far right, and Substack, a newsletter platform.
Following the Post’s report, Amazon altered Alexa’s response, and the device began responding to queries about election fraud by stating, “I’m sorry, I’m not able to answer that.” However, Alexa still responded to other questions with misinformation about the election, the Post found.
Dozens of court challenges from Trump and his allies have not resulted in any findings giving credibility to claims of election fraud. Indeed, research by Trump’s own team found only around nine instances of votes being filed under the names of deceased people, not atypical for an election in which over 158 million Americans took part.
Amazon spokesperson Lauren Raemhild defended the company, claiming the responses from Alexa were “errors that were delivered a small number of times” that were “quickly fixed.” However, several examples of devices sharing misinformation about election fraud were shared on social media.
Commentators have noted that the misinformation could have real implications for the 2024 election, as more than 75 million people in the U.S. are expected to use Echo devices at least once per month next year. A new study also indicates that many users view Alexa as trustworthy, describing the application as more like a real-life secretary than a machine that can be corrupted by false information online.
“If major corporations are helping to give life to the ‘big lie’ years after the fact, they’re enabling the animating narrative of American domestic extremism to endure. They should be doing everything they can to stop the ‘big lie’ in its tracks, lest we see history repeat itself,” Jacob Glick, a former investigative counsel for the January 6 House Select committee and policy counsel at the Georgetown University Law Center’s Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection, told the Post.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.