The American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), a conservative policy group, has helped state lawmakers craft measures aimed at curtailing U.S. EPA air pollution rules, repealing cap and trade and teaching climate skepticism in schools, among many other things.
A future target could be renewable energy mandates, which are on the books in more than half of U.S. states.
“I expect the issue to be discussed at one of our upcoming task force meetings,” Todd Wynn of ALEC told InsideClimate News. “Discussions within the task force can, and do, lead to the development of ALEC model bills.” Wynn directs the council’s Energy, Environment and Agriculture task force.
The Washington-based nonprofit is composed of nearly 2,000 state legislators—most of whom are Republicans—as well as some of the country’s most powerful corporations. Among its members are ExxonMobil, the biggest privately controlled U.S. oil and gas company; energy conglomerate Koch Industries, the second-largest private company in the United States; and Peabody Energy, the country’s largest coal producer. Companies’ annual dues of $7,000 to $25,000, plus their extra cash donations, accounted for most of ALEC’s $7 million budget in 2010, according to media reports.
ALEC’s main activity is to draft model bills and resolutions to reduce government regulation and bolster business interests.
While ALEC has been quietly working to promote a free-market agenda since the 1970s, it was thrust in the media spotlight last summer, when the Center for Media and Democracy, a liberal watchdog group, published an online archive of more than 800 ALEC measures. Today, ALEC is again under the microscope for pushing controversial “stand your ground” gun laws at the center of the Trayvon Martin shooting case in Florida.
On Monday, Bloomberg broke the news that ALEC may write model measures later this year to strike down state renewable portfolio standards (RPS). The report instantly sparked a flurry of outrage in environmental circles.
Already, ALEC has model legislation to help state legislators block a federal RPS. That resolution “urges the United States Congress not to … mandate minimum market shares for such technologies in excess of the levels sustainable subject to real market forces.”
In an interview with InsideClimate News this week, Wynn said that no decision has been made on drafting text to abolish state RPS measures. He anticipates that it will be discussed at meetings this year, and said that “policies related to renewable energy could be brought up in the next couple of years.”
If that happens, Wynn said, it would be to satisfy a growing desire in some states to undo such mandates. “ALEC members are state legislators, and many state legislators are expressing concern about the cost of renewable energy,” he said.
Since last fall, lawmakers in nine states have introduced bills to either repeal or weaken their RPS laws. At least three states—Ohio, Michigan and West Virginia—have proposed legislation to revoke their mandatory standards. The three bills are still in committee.
ALEC holds three conferences a year where state legislators discuss topics for draft legislation. The largest conference will be held in late July.
‘Need to Take It Seriously’
Renewable energy mandates require electric utilities to get a certain percentage of their electricity from clean energy sources. Twenty-nine states and Washington, D.C., have mandatory standards, while 12 have voluntary goals.
Such laws have been around since the late 1990s, though most states adopted them in the mid-2000s. The mounting opposition is due largely to Republican gains in mid-term elections in late 2010. In 20 states, the GOP now controls both the governorship and the legislature, more than double the number two years ago.
Clean energy advocates say the standards are critical for creating steady market demand for clean power and for building America’s clean energy economy.
Environmental advocates in New Jersey, for instance, credit the state’s 13-year-old RPS for helping to create more than 3,000 new jobs in its solar industry, the second-largest solar market in the country. And in Texas, a clean power mandate helped to get a local wind industry off the ground that now employs at least 6,000 people, according to figures from the American Wind Energy Association, a trade group.
Richard Caperton, director of clean energy investment for the Center for American Progress (CAP), a liberal policy group, said RPS measures are one of the main reasons why investment in America’s renewables sector has soared during the past decade. The United States attracted $48.1 billion in public and private financing for clean energy technologies last year, up 40 percent from 2010, according to a recent report by Pew Charitable Trusts.
Caperton said that if ALEC drafts a model bill for repealing RPS policies, it could pose “a big risk” to the nation’s clean energy progress, and “clean energy advocates need to take it seriously.”
“They have very active members who use their model legislation effectively,” he said of ALEC.
An ALEC membership brochure claims that lawmakers typically introduce more than 1,000 bills each year based on the council’s models. Of those, about 17 percent get passed, according to a New York Times report published Saturday.
Wynn of ALEC told InsideClimate News that the council isn’t opposed to developing renewable energy, but that it doesn’t support “mandates that force ratepayers to purchase politically preferred sources of energy,” which he said would require consumers to pay more.
A February report by the Manhattan Institute, a conservative think tank, found that in seven coal-dependent states with RPS mandates, electricity prices rose more than 54 percent between 2001 and 2010, more than double the rate hike in seven other coal states without such laws. In April, CAP released a report that disputed those findings. It found that in 12 states with renewables mandates, price increases slowed after RPS policies were adopted, and in some cases they dropped below the national average. (Paragraph added for clarification 4/27/2012)
ALEC Language in Anti-Climate Bills
ALEC similarly opposes state and federal cap-and-trade schemes, EPA regulations to curb greenhouse gas emissions and other climate initiatives. The group’s website says that it is working with state legislators “to urge withdrawal from … these costly measures that bind businesses and harm economies with no substantial environmental benefit.”
ALEC’s position on global climate change is that it is “a historical phenomenon” and “inevitable.”
Last year, Montana, New Mexico, Oregon and Washington all used ALEC-formulated language in resolutions to withdraw from the Western Climate Initiative. The cap-and-trade program was a pact between seven U.S. states and four Canadian provinces.
Each of those resolutions stated that “the Western Climate Initiative will increase the cost of doing business, push companies to do business with other states or nations and increase consumer costs for electricity, fuel and food.” They also said that “a tremendous amount of economic growth would be sacrificed for a reduction in carbon emissions that would have no appreciable impact on global concentrations on carbon dioxide.”
Both sentences were crafted by ALEC.
The resolutions were either voted down or never moved out of committee. Today, only California and the Canadian provinces remain in the initiative, after Arizona withdrew and all other states were dropped for not passing laws that would allow them to participate.
In New Hampshire, a 2011 bill to exit the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, the first cap-and-trade scheme in America, similarly contained ALEC language. The council’s text was later removed, however, after Rep. James Garrity, a Republican and chair of the House Science, Technology and Energy Committee, protested its inclusion, explaining that the “committee does not feel that editorials belong in laws,” Grist reported last year. Democratic Gov. John Lynch vetoed the bill last July.
Earlier this month, a Media Matters investigation revealed that since 2008 seven states have passed measures or promoted legislation using ALEC text to allow schools to begin teaching “difference perspectives” on “scientific and economic controversies” like evolution and global warming.
Most recently, Tennessee approved a law based on ALEC’s “Environmental Literacy Improvement Act.” That model bill allows teachers to discuss the “scientific weaknesses” of both scientific subjects.
Meanwhile, ALEC recently adopted model legislation for gas drilling, which is designed to let energy companies keep secret the names of certain chemicals used in fracking operations, the New York Times reported. The bill is based on a Texas law, and has provided the basic text for measures in five other states. Its development was sponsored within ALEC by ExxonMobil, the country’s biggest producer of natural gas.
Will ALEC-backed measures similarly further attempts to dismantle renewable power mandates? At this point only time will tell, said Caperton of the Center for American Progress.
Pointing to the increasing media scrutiny of the council, he said that “ALEC is under siege right now, and it’s unclear how that is going to play out. That definitely impacts how effective they’ll be at this [anti-RPS] effort.”
It takes longer to read this sentence than it does to support our work.
We don’t have much time left to raise the $15,000 needed to meet Truthout‘s basic publishing costs this month. Will you take a few seconds to donate and give us a much-needed boost?
We know you are deeply committed to the issues that matter, and you count on us to bring you trustworthy reporting and comprehensive analysis on the real issues facing our country and the world. And as a nonprofit newsroom supported by reader donations, we’re counting on you too. If you believe in the importance of an independent, free media, please make a tax-deductible donation today!