The Intercept revealed last month that it is quite easy to be deemed a “suspected terrorist” at airports in the United States. A leaked checklist used by the Transportation Security Administration shows an expansive list of “suspicious signs” for screening passengers, including yawning, fidgeting, whistling, throat clearing and staring at one’s feet. All of these, according to the TSA, are considered behaviors that indicate stress or deception. Well now The Intercept has revealed who the program actually targets: not terrorists, but undocumented immigrants. Taking a five-week period at a major U.S. airport, The Intercept found that 90 percent of all those arrested were detained for being in the country illegally. Not a single passenger was arrested or suspected for ties to terrorism. The overwhelming detention of undocumented immigrants bolsters criticism that government screening programs have targeted passengers with racial profiling. We speak to the reporter who broke this story, Jana Winter.
TRANSCRIPT:
AMY GOODMAN: This is Democracy Now!, democracynow.org, The War and Peace Report. I’m Amy Goodman with Aaron Maté as we move now into our last segment.
AARON MATÉ: Last month, the website The Intercept revealed it’s quite easy to be deemed a suspected terrorist at a U.S. airport. A leaked checklist used by the Transportation Security Administration shows an expansive list of suspicious signs for screening passengers. Yawning, fidgeting, whistling, throat clearing, and staring at one’s feet. All of these, according to the TSA, are considered behaviors that indicate stress or deception. Well, now, The Intercept has revealed who the program actually targets — not terrorists, but undocumented immigrants. Taking a five-week period at a major U.S. airport, The Intercept found that 90 percent of all those arrested were detained for being in the country illegally. Not a single passenger was arrested for ties to terrorism. The overwhelming detention of undocumented immigrants bolsters criticism that government screening programs have targeted passengers with racial profiling.
AMY GOODMAN: I hesitate to clear my throat here, but they’ve also cost taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars. The checklist is part of the TSA’s controversial program known as the Screening of Passengers by Observation Techniques, or SPOT. It employs specially trained officers, known as behavior detection officers, to watch and interact with passengers going through screening. The TSA has trained and deployed thousands of these officers, spending more than $900 million on this program since its inception in 2007. For more we are joined by the reporter who broke the story, Jana Winter is a reporter with The Intercept. Her latest piece headlined, “TSA ‘Behavior Detection’ Program Targeting Undocumented Immigrants, Not Terrorists.” So explain how and welcome to Democracy Now!
JANA WINTER: Thanks for having me. Well, we looked at — to be clear, this is just a five-week period at one major international Airport in 2007. We don’t know if this is still what is going on, although, all of my sources currently at TSA say it is. But if you look through what happened during this time period, so 429 times, a behavior detection officer interacted with a passenger they thought might be suspicious. Meaning, those same indicators on that checklist like, your luggage is heavier than it appears to be — which is me and everyone. So then out of that group, 47 were referred to law enforcement. Out of the 47, 16 were arrested in total, 14 were for being in the country illegally. And that is about 3.75 percent of their entire work product for five weeks. It resulted in an arrest. And they were for people being in the country illegally.
AMY GOODMAN: How did racial profiling factor into these detentions, do you think?
JANA WINTER: Well, according to my sources within the program or people who have worked in the program in the past or any of the numerous oversight agencies that have been looking at this program for quite a while, the way that it was designed and the model that it was based off of was related to what customs and border protection was doing. This is how — this is a very effective way for finding drugs or people being smuggled across the border. You are looking for fake IDs, you’re looking for fraudulent travel, you know, any kind of document. You can, according to my sources, look for these signs like confusion, people who are wearing pretty similar identical outfits that are brand new, and luggage, all of the signs that appear on the checklist for terrorism. But that’s not how you find terrorists, it’s just how you find undocumented people in the country. So my sources say from the very beginning, this was never going to find terrorist’s.
AMY GOODMAN: And so what is the TSA saying about these documents? And are they saying that you are now arming the terrorists with the documents of how they seek them out?
JANA WINTER: I have no idea, because when I reach out to them for comment, I hear they have been skiing and unavailable for five weeks. Or they do not respond. Last night when I got into Penn Station at about 11:30, all of a sudden, the one TSA spokesman started favoriting all of my tweets on Twitter, and I was like, seriously? I’m still waiting for your comment. I asked, here’s what I have, specifically, do these numbers indicate current trends, nationwide trends? I have no idea what they’re saying. They have been defending this program that everyone else has said is based on complete junk science and has spent over $1 billion, basically, doing the job of customs and border protection, which is not the mission of the TSA.
AMY GOODMAN: Well, can you talk about this, the TSA encroaching on the mandate of another agency and then possibly jeopardizing the rights of people who are undocumented, but not trying to cross a border, per se?
JANA WINTER: Well, in some cases they are trying to cross the border, because once you go through an airport, sort of, screening point — but for the last six years, since its inception almost, the GAO, DHS Inspector General’s office, various congressional committees, have said, looks like you’re targeting undocumented immigrants. But TSA has this thing where they classify everything as sensitive security information. It’s like their own invented classification. So they couldn’t release anything. In the GAO reports you just see, like, redacted, redacted, TSA would not supply the documents. People have long been saying that this is what’s happening. We just now have numbers to show that, here it is, where are your terrorists?
AMY GOODMAN: Well, Jana Winter, we want to thank you very much for being with us, a reporter with The Intercept. Her latest piece is headlined, “TSA ‘Behavior Detection’ Program Targeting Undocumented Immigrants, Not Terrorists.” , and we’ll link to it at democracynow.org. That does it for our program.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy