Honest, paywall-free news is rare. Please support our boldly independent journalism with a donation of any size.
UK police have arrested the former Prince Andrew, the brother of King Charles, on suspicion of misconduct in public office. Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor was previously sued in 2021 by Epstein survivor Virginia Giuffre, who accused him of multiple instances of sexual assault when she was underage. The lawsuit was settled out of court shortly after it was filed, but Mountbatten-Windsor was allowed to keep his royal title and privileges at the time. Those were recently stripped following revelations about the extent of his friendship with the American serial sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Their friendship has been widely known to the public since at least 2008, when Epstein was first convicted for soliciting a minor for sex.
British authorities are now reportedly investigating whether Mountbatten-Windsor shared confidential government information with Epstein in 2010 while serving as a U.K. trade representative. “This is a story about sex trafficking, about the abuse of numerous women, and it seems like where justice might be brought, it’s on a different charge, which is sharing confidential information with a powerful person,” says Novara Media’s Michael Walker.
TRANSCRIPT
This is a rush transcript. Copy may not be in its final form.
NERMEEN SHAIKH: We end today’s show with breaking news. In the United Kingdom, police have arrested former Prince Andrew, the brother of King Charles, on suspicion of misconduct in public office. Authorities say they are investigating a complaint over allegations that the former prince had shared confidential material with the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The former prince was the UK’s trade envoy between 2001 and 2011.
AMY GOODMAN: Back in November, King Charles stripped his brother of his title as Prince and Duke of York and evicted him from his royal residence over his relationship with Epstein. We are joined now by Michael Walker, contributing editor at Novara Media where he hosts the organization’s flagship live news program Novara Live. Today is — I was going to say Prince Andrew’s, but it’s Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor — and he has been arrested on his 66th birthday. Talk about the significance of this.
MICHAEL WALKER: I have to say that on our show we’re still calling him Prince Andrew, because I don’t think the royal family can get out of this so easily just saying, “We’re taking the title off him. It’s got nothing to do with us.” They obviously knew he had a relationship for a long time before they stripped his title of that. In terms of this particular case, it’s actually remarkably similar to the row — well, it’s more than a row, isn’t it? — the investigation into Peter Mandelson, which is that what these emails appear to have revealed is that when there were powerful men in positions of responsibility and influence, they used that influence, they used that access that they had, to forward on confidential information that should’ve been kept secret, to Jeffrey Epstein.
In the case of Peter Mandelson, that involved what was going on in 10 Downing Street. When it comes to Prince Andrew, it seems to be what was discussed on trade trips. Emails indicate Andrew forwarded official confidential trip reports from Singapore, Vietnam and China to Epstein shortly after receiving them. So, that seems to be what the police are currently investigating. Their job is to judge whether this reaches the threshold of misconduct in public office.
NERMEEN SHAIKH: Yeah, and it’s clear that misconduct is a really complicated offense, misconduct in public office. This is as I’m reading from the BBC, quoting the legal correspondent. It essentially boils down to an allegation that someone who was doing a job on behalf of the British public did something seriously wrong, knowing it to be wrong. But there are four elements or factors that the police must investigate. If you could elaborate on that and also tell us where has he gone and what comes next? Where was he taken?
MICHAEL WALKER: He was taken to a police station for questioning. People think that’s significant because he wouldn’t have known he was going to be arraigned. So often when it comes to crimes which were committed — well, I should say alleged crimes, investigations into alleged crimes committed in the past — you might get forewarning. You might get invited to speak the police. Now it seems they didn’t want to give him forewarning. I suppose there was an understanding that Andrew is someone who likes to prepare for interviews and I suppose they wanted him potentially to be a bit more candid, to not have his lines prepared.
When it comes to the actual crime which he is being investigated for, the political journalists are sort of desperately trying to catch up on this because it is not something which has appeared in political debate very often. It’s the sort of crime which as far as I understand tends to be leveled at people like prison officers. So it might be someone who is working in a prison office — or working in a prison, I should say — in a position of responsibility and they help a prisoner speak to a gang member outside and potentially arrange for some sort of crime to be committed. So I think normally you have a very high threshold and it is a bit more open and shut. What is interesting here is that I’m not sure what they will be investigating. Because we’ve all seen the emails. The question is just whether or not this meets this threshold. I suppose they will be discussing with Andrew whether or not he knew that what he did was a breach of his responsibility in that role.
AMY GOODMAN: What’s astounding, Michael, is you have Andrew being arrested, and here in the United States we have not seen as much fallout. In fact, I think President Trump just said that the millions of pages of documents have exonerated him, though he was named over 1,000 times. Next up could be, is that right, the former British ambassador to the U.S., Mandelson, who also interestingly was a trade envoy, and there are questions about revealing information that was given over to Jeffrey Epstein.
MICHAEL WALKER: Yeah, I think what is interesting here, and what’s disappointing to some people actually, is obviously this is a story about sex trafficking, about the abuse of numerous women, and it seems like where justice might be brought, it is on a different charge, which is sharing confidential information with a powerful person. In both cases — Mandelson and Prince Andrew — there are suggestions that maybe there were quid pro quos here. When it came to Mandelson, he was sharing this information which was market sensitive and which would have been useful to Epstein, and it seems that in return what he was getting was Epstein’s “help” in helping his lobbying firm after he left government, or getting a job with J.P. Morgan. These seem to be what he was considering. He didn’t end up getting a job with J.P. Morgan but he clearly from the emails was angling for one. With Andrew, we know that —
AMY GOODMAN: Michael Walker, we’re going to have to leave it there, but we thank you so much for being with us, with Novara Media in London. And today marks Democracy Now!’s 30th anniversary on the air, our first show February 19, 1996. We’ve got show Nermeen as well here in this image. On Monday we will be celebrating at Riverside Church in New York. Guests will include Angela Davis, Naomi Klein, Maria Ressa, Michael Stipe, Wynton Marsalis, Mosab Abu Toha, V, Hurray for the Riff Raff and more. We will be streaming the event live at Democracynow.org. Happy anniversary, everyone! Happy anniversary, Nermeen!
NERMEEN SHAIKH: Happy anniversary, Amy!
A terrifying moment. We appeal for your support.
In the last weeks, we have witnessed an authoritarian assault on communities in Minnesota and across the nation.
The need for truthful, grassroots reporting is urgent at this cataclysmic historical moment. Yet, Trump-aligned billionaires and other allies have taken over many legacy media outlets — the culmination of a decades-long campaign to place control of the narrative into the hands of the political right.
We refuse to let Trump’s blatant propaganda machine go unchecked. Untethered to corporate ownership or advertisers, Truthout remains fearless in our reporting and our determination to use journalism as a tool for justice.
But we need your help just to fund our basic expenses. Over 80 percent of Truthout’s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors.
Truthout has launched a fundraiser to add 379 new monthly donors in the next 6 days. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger one-time gift, Truthout only works with your support.