Skip to content Skip to footer

Bill McKibben: Obama Can Salvage His Climate Legacy by Rejecting Keystone XL Oil Pipeline

McKibben argues that Obama’s pending decision on whether to approve or reject the Keystone XL’s construction is a historic opportunity.

Bill McKibben, co-founder and director of 350.org, joins us to discuss “Draw the Line,” a national day of action this Saturday to protest the Keystone XL oil pipeline. Already this week on Monday, 13 people were arrested during a protest in Houston in front of the offices of TransCanada, the company behind the controversial project. McKibben has just come out with the new book, “Oil and Honey: The Education of an Unlikely Activist.” McKibben argues that Obama’s pending decision on whether to approve or reject the Keystone XL’s construction is a historic opportunity. “If [Obama] says no to the Keystone pipeline, he will be the first world leader ever to say, ‘Here is something we are not going to build because of its effect on the climate,'” McKibben says. “It might have the effect of unfreezing the climate negotiations that have been wrecked ever since Copenhagen … Sometimes Obama, correctly, can blame his absurd Congress. But in the case of the Keystone pipeline, he gets to make the call himself. So he darn well better make that call.”

TRANSCRIPT:

NERMEEN SHAIKH: We continue now with Bill McKibben, Co-founder and Director of 350.org, which has called for a day of action this Saturday to protest the Keystone XL and demand that President Obama stop the proposed pipeline. Already this week on Monday, 13 people were arrested during a protest in Houston in front of the offices of TransCanada, the company behind the controversial project. Also this week, Bill McKibben’s new book was released. It’s called, “Oil and Honey: The Education of an Unlikely Activist.” You can go to our website to read chapter one .

AMY GOODMAN: Today the House Subcommittee on Energy and Power is set to hold a hearing on President Obama’s plan to reduce U.S. greenhouse gas emissions. EPA chief, Gina McCarthy, and Energy Secretary, Ernest Moniz, are scheduled to testify that why the plan is necessary. Out of the 17 Republican members of the committee, 14 of them have publicly disputed the existence of climate change. Bill McKibben, do you feel there have been advances in awareness of climate change? Talk about the activism you’re engaged in right now.

BILL MCKIBBEN: I think what’s going on is the fight is sharpening, OK? People are getting engaged and the fight over the Keystone pipeline is a good example. When we started this two years ago, everybody had said, it is a done deal, you’ve got no chance. But, people all over the country stood up. This leaderless, sprawling, interesting movement.

AMY GOODMAN: Explain what it is.

BILL MCKIBBEN: It is this pipeline down under the tar sands of Canada to the Gulf of Mexico. People who are opposing it are Indigenous allies, First Nations people in Canada, because it’s a disaster up there, farmers and ranchers along the route and then people all over the country who —

NERMEEN SHAIKH: Well, what are some of the effects?

BILL MCKIBBEN: …understood its climate effects.

NERMEEN SHAIKH: And what are some of the climate effects that are anticipated?

BILL MCKIBBEN: Jim Hansen at NASA said, if you tap into, if you burn all of that economically recoverable oil up there in Alberta, then it is game over for the planet. There’s just too much carbon. There are eight or 10 of these formations around the world.

AMY GOODMAN: What is it about the oil, tar sands?

BILL MCKIBBEN: Is incredibly dirty stuff. They call it Bitumen. It is oil mixed with sand. So, you have to — not only is it dirty like all oil terms of carbon emissions, but it is extra dirty because you have to heat it up or whatever to get it out of the ground in the first place. I was just up there this summer to look at the tar sands complex. The technical name for what was going on Mordor, it is unbelievable. You just can’t imagine how gruesome it is. But, its biggest effect in the end is the pool of carbon that it pours into the atmosphere that drives the global warming that accounts for the pictures you just showed from Colorado. We’ve destabilized the planet’s climate system, and the only question is, how much farther we are going to go.

We have raised the temperature of the planet one degree already. But, the scientists who told us that would happen now tell us we’ll raise it 3 or 4 degrees before the century is out unless we get off the coal and gas and oil. And if it goes up anything like that then all you’re ever going to be talking about, you or your successors by midcentury, are just an endless series of those kinds of images. What we call civilization will just be a big disaster response operation.

NERMEEN SHAIKH: When is President Obama expected to make a decision on the pipeline? So, why this protest this Saturday?

BILL MCKIBBEN: Sometime in the next year he is supposed to make a decision. For a while, we were happy with delay because it was in a way all that we could hope for. But, now it has become very clear that this is an opportunity for the president. If he says no to the Keystone pipeline, he will be the first world leader ever to say, here is something we are not going to build because of its effect on the climate. That would be a big deal. It might have the effect of unfreezing the climate negotiations that have been wrecked over since Copenhagen. Which, if you think about —

AMY GOODMAN: Who wrecked them?

BILL MCKIBBEN: Well, it was a joint wreckage effort, but it is clearly the blackest mark on the Obama record. I mean, 50 years, people will look back at this administration and they won’t really remember much about the sequester or the war in Libya or whatever it is, they will think, huh, this was our chance here at Copenhagen and nothing happened and the world’s sole superpower was a a big part in nothing happening. Some of the time Obama, correctly, can blame his absurd Congress. But, in this case of the Keystone pipeline, he gets to make the call himself so he darn well better make that call.

AMY GOODMAN: You’ve certainly laid the groundwork. 350.org, and many other environmental groups. Take us on the timeline, why it has come to this point where a decision wasn’t released a while ago. A couple of summers ago when he was in Martha’s Vineyard with his family you guys engaged in this civil disobedience, 1200 of you were arrested. And then talk about what happened next.

BILL MCKIBBEN: Sure, so that was the biggest civil disobedience action in 30 years in this country about anything, 1253 people went to jail. That, sort of, brought this issue that no one knew about to the public attention. Then we followed the president around the country and, sort of, bird-dogged him, and very politely, really, people would chant “yes, we can stop the pipeline.” Surrounded the White House with 15,000 people, five deep, shoulder to shoulder. A few days after that, he said, OK we will take a year and study this. Now there were people said that was cynical, it would just get him past the election. Maybe so, what do I know. But we’re, obviously, past the election.

AMY GOODMAN: Then they did a study, The State Department.

BILL MCKIBBEN: The State Department does a series of incredibly bad environmental impact statements that somehow have found it makes no difference that you tap into these tar sands.

AMY GOODMAN: And who is the contractor that did the study?

BILL MCKIBBEN: That — one of the reasons there has been a weak is because they they essentially hired the friends of the pipeline company to do this. All of that is just this endless, ongoing saga of corruption and lobbying and influence peddling.

AMY GOODMAN: But, perhaps wouldn’t have been exposed if it weren’t for the activism.

BILL MCKIBBEN: I think that is right. If people hadn’t started down this path, then we wouldn’t — and it makes one wonder what goes on in all the cases were no one bothers to raise a ruckus. But, in the end, from the beginning and to the end, this has been a question about Barack Obama, in the end. If he does the right thing here, he will have at least the beginnings of some kind of legacy on climate. If he does the wrong thing, I’m afraid it’s one more of these cases, maybe the most egregious, where we look at him and say, big talk, small action.

AMY GOODMAN: Your book, Bill McKibben, “Oil and Honey: The Education of an Unlikely Activist.” A lot of people just know you as an activist, certainly not an unlikely one, but talk about the honey part.

BILL MCKIBBEN: Yes, so, I’ve been on the road a lot, too much, and I am going be on the road less because I want to get back and spend time in Vermont. To describe the work of my neighbor, first real chemical-free apiarist, beekeeper, in the country a wonderful man named Kirk Webster. And it is counterpoint to this other work I’ve been doing. It is about the local and the global. Because we need to work on both fronts. We’ve got to build the kind of beautiful local economies that we’re starting to build in places like Vermont.

In counterpoint, sadly, we also have to work globally because those global forces come to local places. Vermont — I mean, the pictures you’re showing today of Colorado, were pictures of Vermont two years ago. Along with the roads and bridges, one thing that got washed away, were an awful lot of the beautiful, small organic farms people had built over the last 20 years. They were in river bottoms and in ten minutes they went from fertile solid to rocks and sand. There is no way to escape. We have to both do that work close to home and do that work out in the world. Really, that is what the book is about. But, the best parts really are about the bees.

One of the things that, really, I finally figured out watching the bees was a little bit about movements. Bees do their work, really, without much leadership. It is a cooperative operation and a highly effective one. It’s the same kind of movement we are trying to build around climate. It does not depend on great leaders, there is no Dr. King. What there is, is now, this linked effort of thousands of groups around the country and around the world who work on local things but when the need arises, like this Saturday when we are doing this nationwide protests on Keystone XL, they come together also to make those statements. People are getting sophisticated enough, I’m getting sophisticated enough, finally to understand how this local and global intermesh with each other, and it is an exciting moment in that way. Who knows whether we started in time to get ahead of the curve of climate change. I mean, right now physics is winning. But, people all over the world, really, are doing their best now.

NERMEEN SHAIKH: Why are bees important, can you explain, for the environment?

BILL MCKIBBEN: Well, bees are a whole other in and of themselves, and they’re not faring well, as you know. There were stories in The Times a few months ago saying we may have lost half the beehives in the country this year. A variety of things are happening. Climate change is playing some role, but there is also this new class of pesticides, the neonicotinoids that seem to be doing huge damage to bees. In Europe they have now been banned, but of course our Republic, the power of big [agriculture] has been enough to make sure we’re going to keep killing bees a season or two more. It’s crazy, I mean, there’s certain things we just absolutely need. On of them are the incredible services of the billions of bees who pollinate most of what we eat. There is no substitute. There are no drone bees we can go and build in a lab and send them out to do it. There’s not enough Americans to go pollinate by hand all of the things that need pollinating. It’s crazy to be letting one of our great resources just disappear. But that is increasingly what we’re doing.

AMY GOODMAN: So you head to Seattle on Saturday?

BILL MCKIBBEN: I will be in Seattle for this — we’re calling Draw the Line Against Keystone XL, and one of the points where making is, look, if you’re worried about putting a red line against the deadly gas, this is one case where we can do it without dropping a missile on anybody. All we need to do is stand up to this pipeline and it is within the power of the President to do it all by himself.

AMY GOODMAN: Bill McKibben, we want to thank you very much for being with us. We will post the first chapter of your book, “Oil and Honey” online at democracynow.org. Bill McKibben is the Co-founder of 350.org. The day of action has been called for Saturday to protest the Keystone XL and demand of President Obama to stop the proposed pipeline. This is Democracy Now!, democracynow.org, The War and Peace Report. When we come back, we will be joined by a man whose name has — is become synonymous with the movement against fast food, who wrote, “Fast food Nation.” Now he has written a new book, and it’s called, “Command and Control: Nuclear Weapons, the Damascus Accident and the Illusion of Safety.” It’s Damascus, Arkansas. Stay with us.

Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn

Dear Truthout Community,

If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.

We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.

Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.

There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.

After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?

It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.

We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.

We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.

Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.

We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.

With love, rage, and solidarity,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy