Skip to content Skip to footer
|

As FBI Seeks Capture of Assata Shakur, NAACP Head Calls for US Truth and Reconciliation Commission

Earlier this month, former Black Panther Assata Shakur was added to the FBI’s Most Wanted Terrorists list, becoming the first woman ever to make the list.

Earlier this month, former Black Panther Assata Shakur was added to the FBI’s Most Wanted Terrorists list, becoming the first woman ever to make the list. In addition, the state of New Jersey announced it was adding $1 million to the FBI’s $1 million reward for her capture. She was convicted in the May 2, 1973, killing of a New Jersey police officer during a shootout that left one of her fellow activists dead. She was shot twice by police during the incident. In 1979, she managed to escape from jail. Shakur fled to Cuba, where she received political asylum. Shakur has long proclaimed her innocence and accused federal authorities of political persecution. We ask NAACP President Benjamin Jealous about her case. “We have not taken any position on the Shakur case,” Jealous says. “But I do think that if we are going to heal as a nation, we must look at the violence, the sort of politically motivated violence on both sides, and figure out how we heal both at once.”

TRANSCRIPT:

AMY GOODMAN: Very quickly, Ben, has the NAACP taken a position on Assata Shakur, who’s in Cuba, has been. The president—the FBI has just put her on the Most Wanted Terrorists list, the first woman to be placed on it, and increased the bounty for her to $2 million.

BENJAMIN JEALOUS: This is a—frankly, all of the political prisoner cases from the ’60s are a concern. And closing the unsolved lynchings are something that we’re still working on. And it makes you wonder if the country isn’t coming to a place where we need some sort of truth and reconciliation commission to help us deal with what are very painful moments. I mean, if you think about the police officers here, you know, in the New York, New Jersey area, still—their families still feel very aggrieved about what happened with the Brink’s case, about what happened on the turnpike in this shooting. When you go down to Georgia, as I was a couple weeks ago, and you have unsolved lynchings from 60 years ago, and you see kind of pain, you know, in the black community, and very suspicion of sheriffs, people feel like have been, for years. And so, we have not taken a position on the Shakur case, but I do think that we have to, if we’re going to heal as a nation, look at the violence, the sort of politically motivated violence, on both sides, and figure out how we heal both at once.

I used to be the managing editor of a paper called The Jackson Advocate in Jackson, Mississippi. Our paper was burned down three times. My publisher used to have lunch with the grand wizard of the Ku Klux Klan every month. And, you know, he comes in, and I said—you know, he comes in one day. I’m sitting in his office waiting for him. I’m like, “Why? Why? Why?” And he said, “At the end of day,” he said, “two things. One, ain’t nobody in this town who wants to talk to either one of us about the Civil War again. We both like talking about it. Alright?” He said, “But, two, it’s time that we start listening to each other and figuring out how we heal this, because it’s just not ending. The war, it just isn’t ending. The Civil War isn’t ending.” And these were two old men, you know, both within a decade of dying, who sat down across great difference, across great pain. I mean, my publisher had covered the Emmett Till case. He had had many friends killed by the Klan, and said, “It’s just time for us to bury the hatchet and figure out how we move forward.”

And so, my hope is that we, as a country, can start a conversation about a truth and reconciliation commission, because these old wounds, the wounds around Shakur in the kind of progressive community, and so many other cases—you know, so many Shakurs, right? The wounds down South with the unsolved lynchings—it’s just time for us to find a new way. I don’t see it really ending. And I don’t see politicians kind of backing down and saying, you know, “We’re going to approach this with our whole mind and our whole heart.” The battle lines are drawn, and they’ve been drawn for a long time.

AMY GOODMAN: Ben Jealous, I want to thank you for being with us, president and CEO of the NAACP. Coming up, we’ll look at the case of the Puerto Rican independence activist Oscar López Rivera. He’s been held for the past 32 years in jail. Stay with us.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.