Skip to content Skip to footer

Sgt. Robert Bales and the Trauma of Repeat Deployments

Does Robert Bales, the army staff sergeant who allegedly killed 17 Afghan civilians on March 11, symbolize a larger problem in our military ranks? In this web-exclusive video, Vietnam veteran and military scholar Andrew Bacevich talks with Bill Moyers about Bales’ accountability, the stress of repeated tours on soldiers, and how war itself “compromises our … Continued

Part of the Series

Does Robert Bales, the army staff sergeant who allegedly killed 17 Afghan civilians on March 11, symbolize a larger problem in our military ranks? In this web-exclusive video, Vietnam veteran and military scholar Andrew Bacevich talks with Bill Moyers about Bales’ accountability, the stress of repeated tours on soldiers, and how war itself “compromises our humanity.”

This weekend on public television, Moyers and Bacevich explore the futility of “endless” wars, and provide a reality check on the rhetoric of American exceptionalism.

TRANSCRIPT:

BILL MOYERS: Let me ask you as an old warrior and Vietnam veteran, how you come to terms with a cold-blooded massacre committed against civilians by another soldier?

ANDREW BACEVICH: Well, I find it very troubling. But I think I’m— reluctant to see it as somehow— emblematic of the values that prevail— in the ranks. There will be those who will want to excuse the actions of Sergeant Bales— who will— cite— growing evidence of his personal difficulties, who will note that this was his— fourth— combat tour— as a way to— wave it away. I certainly wouldn’t wanna go— in that direction either. He needs to be held accountable. Those who sent him on this fourth combat tour need to be held accountable. But Sergeant Bales is not somehow a symbol of the larger U.S. military.

BILL MOYERS: On the way to the studio this morning, the taxi driver was lamenting the fact that his niece, who joined and went to Iraq four years ago, I believe it was, has now had two terms. And— and he was saying, “How can he do this?”

ANDREW BACEVICH: Well, I— I think what— what— what I find shocking is the profession of people to be shocked, that we have these soldiers going back for repeated tours. It’s been reported for years now. It— it ought to be common knowledge. And it ought to be common knowledge that Americans generally find— unacceptable, or at least disturbing. I mean, what do we think is going to result— when we embark upon open-ended wars, to which roughly 1% of the American people are committed in terms of active engagement, and we send them back again and again and again. I mean, in— in a sense, I think as— terrible— as this episode is, it really pales, I think, in comparison to what we already know about the epidemic P.T.S.D. Post-traumatic stress disorder, which is already one of the results of the Iraq and Afghanistan’s wars.

BILL MOYERS: I can’t recall, were— were— were there rotations in Vietnam?

ANDREW BACEVICH: Yes. The— the average tour of duty, the standard tour of duty in Vietnam was— was one year. And that war did go on long enough that there were certain numbers of soldiers, not me— who were— deployed— involuntarily for a second or a third tour. But in nowhere near the numbers— that— is the case today, because the wars have gone on today twice as long as the Vietnam War. The older I get— the more I am persuaded that war is not simply evil and therefore to be avoided if at all— if— if— if at all possible. But war is— destructive of the human spirit. War compromises our humanity. There may be some people who walk away from the experience of combat and are better as a consequence. But I’m persuaded that those people are few in number. And that for the great majority— there are wounds that may not be visible— or that may not become visible— until years— after the fact. I cannot say that I came away from my Vietnam service particularly traumatized. But as time has gone along, I’m becoming increasingly aware of the extent to which friends of mine, classmates of mine from West Point were traumatized— whose lives were deeply— affected. Sometimes in ways that were not immediately evident back when we were in our 20s or in our— in our 30s. But it’s— it’s an evil thing.

Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn

Dear Truthout Community,

If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.

We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.

Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.

There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.

Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?

It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.

We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.

We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.

Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment. We are presently looking for 253 new monthly donors in the next 3 days.

We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.

With love, rage, and solidarity,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy