A judge in Wyoming has blocked the enforcement of a ban on abortion medication in the state, pending the results of a lawsuit seeking to overturn the ban.
Teton County Judge Melissa Owens established the temporary injunction on Thursday, stating that plaintiffs in the lawsuit against the state “have clearly [shown] probable success” regarding the legal merits of their case. The judge’s decision renders the law — the first of its kind, banning the most widely used method of abortion in the U.S. — unenforceable for the duration of the trial.
Four women, two obstetricians and two nonprofit groups are among those suing the state over the law, which forbids the use of medication to induce an abortion. The plaintiffs had also filed a lawsuit against the state’s near-total ban on abortion, which became law in March. Owens has also blocked enforcement of that statute, combining the two separate lawsuits into one singular case.
In their arguments, the plaintiffs cited the Wyoming state constitution, which includes a provision passed by voters in 2012 that forbids governments from interfering with residents’ health care choices. That resolution was promoted by Republican lawmakers in response to unwarranted fears about the Affordable Care Act, commonly known as Obamacare.
Earlier this year, Owens also blocked a law that banned nearly all abortions in Wyoming, citing that same state constitutional amendment as rationale for doing so. GOP lawmakers in the state seemed to recognize, even in crafting the anti-abortion statutes, that the amendment could be used to block their draconian policies, writing in that abortion law an explicit command that abortion isn’t health care — a blatant attempt to circumvent the amendment’s scope.
During the hearing on Thursday, lawyers for the state tried to make the same failing argument, with special assistant Attorney General Jay Jerde arguing before the judge that abortion isn’t health care because “it’s not restoring the [person’s] body from pain, physical disease or sickness.”
But Owens questioned that narrative, noting that the decision on whether or not to get an abortion was being made by the government, “which is what the overwhelming majority in Wyoming decided” against in 2012 by endorsing the amendment provision.
Health experts largely agree that abortion does fall under the purview of health care, including the American Medical Association and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
While most Americans support abortion rights, residents of Wyoming have historically been more split on the issue. Most, however, do not favor a complete ban on the procedure.
In a poll conducted by the University of Wyoming last fall — just months after the Supreme Court upended abortion protections that were established in Roe v. Wade — 36 percent of respondents said abortion should be a personal choice, while another 36 percent said exceptions should be made in certain circumstances, such as in cases of rape or incest. Only 11 percent of respondents said they supported a complete ban on abortion in the state.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy