An effort to enshrine abortion rights in the Florida state constitution is gaining steam, and will likely be included on the 2024 general election ballot if current trends hold steady.
However, the proposed amendment faces some hurdles before it can be accepted on the ballot, including passing muster in the state’s conservative Supreme Court.
For the petition to be considered, it must receive around 891,000 signatures from voters in the state. So far, the petition has received about 250,000 signatures, and is well on its way to passing the threshold by the end-of-the-year deadline.
If approved and included on next year’s ballot, the proposal would need to be backed by 60 percent of Florida voters in order to become an official amendment.
If passed, the proposal would result in significant changes to state law. Most notably, it would upend the restrictive six-week abortion ban that Gov. Ron DeSantis(R) signed into law this past spring. That bill also placed limits on abortions in cases of rape and incest, and only allows abortions during later stages of a pregnancy if a pregnant person’s life is at risk.
Such provisions have made many doctors and health care providers hesitant to provide abortions in emergencies, as it is often unclear whether abortion is considered necessary to save a person’s life under the law. If physicians wait too long to perform an abortion, pregnant people can face permanent health issues or even death.
The proposed amendment has broad support across the state, with internal polling from the organization managing the signature campaign saying that 70 percent of Floridians back its passage. But some abortion advocates have pointed out that there are still issues with the proposal — namely, that its ambiguous language will likely result in challenges from right-wing groups, and that its wording is not inclusive of all people who can get pregnant.
The proposed constitutional amendment reads, in part, that “no law shall prohibit, penalize, delay, or restrict abortion before viability or when necessary to protect the patient’s health, as determined by the patient’s healthcare provider.” Although fetal viability is generally accepted to be around 24 months, this ambiguity may help anti-abortion activists in their goal to block the proposal, since the state Supreme Court has the ability to block ballot initiatives if they deem them to be confusing to voters.
In a supposed effort to appear more bipartisan, proponents of the proposal have used terminology that is gender exclusive, disregarding trans and nonbinary people in the state who are able to become pregnant.
The amendment also wouldn’t change state law that requires parents to be notified if minors obtain an abortion — a standard that could threaten the safety and livelihood of children who need the procedure.
In response to these concerns, the group has said that it is dedicated to making compromises in order for the proposal to be passed.
“This is bipartisan,” Anna Hochkammer, executive director of the Florida Women’s Freedom Coalition, the group managing the signature campaign, has said. “We have people with no party affiliation. People who hate politics. People who are extremely left. People who are extremely right. People who are libertarian and think government shouldn’t exist. You name it.”
Beyond the group’s internal polling, a survey from the University of North Florida suggests that the proposal has a good chance of passing. Three-quarters of state residents (75 percent) are opposed to the current six-week abortion ban, that poll found, including 61 percent of Republicans.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.