Skip to content Skip to footer

Wisconsin GOP Candidate for Congress Fined for Bringing Loaded Gun to Airport

Derrick Van Orden, who was at the Capitol on January 6, is running for an open congressional seat in western Wisconsin.

Derrick Van Orden arrives at Writers Guild Theater on September 16, 2019, in Beverly Hills, California.

A far right Republican candidate for Congress in western Wisconsin who was present during the Trump-inspired attack on the United States Capitol building has tried to board a plane with a loaded gun in his carry-on luggage.

According to reporting from The Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel, Derrick Van Orden was stopped by Transportation Security Administration (TSA) agents after they discovered a loaded 9mm Sig Sauer handgun in his possession as he passed through security at an airport in Cedar Rapids, Iowa.

The incident happened last August but received little-to-no attention at the time. Following a similar incident involving Rep. Madison Cawthorn (R-North Carolina) late last month, however, the event involving Van Orden has received renewed interest.

Van Orden received two fines for his indiscretion, which, according to a spokesperson for the candidate running in Wisconsin’s open Third Congressional District this year, was “purely accidental.” He ended up paying an unspecified fine to the TSA as well as being fined separately in a magistrate court in Iowa in the amount of $360. Van Orden was also ordered to take a firearms safety course, which he completed earlier this year.

https://twitter.com/thanewisc/status/1523681001913741312

Besides bringing luggage into airport security that contained a loaded weapon, Van Orden and Cawthorn have also both been criticized for their actions on January 6, 2021 — the day a mob of loyalists to former President Donald Trump stormed the U.S. Capitol in order to thwart the certification of the 2020 presidential election.

Cawthorn, who stirred up the mob in a speech at the White House prior to the attack on Congress, is one of dozens of Republicans in Congress who voted against certifying now-President Joe Biden’s victory over Trump. Van Orden, meanwhile, was part of the mob that rushed the Capitol building itself, though he continues to deny that he personally engaged in violence that day.

Van Orden has not been charged with any crime relating to that day’s events, according to Department of Justice records.

Days after the attack occurred, Van Orden condemned the violence, saying he was unaware of what was happening at the time. Van Orden also suggested that his presence in Washington D.C. that day was innocuous, writing in an op-ed that he was there for “meetings and to stand for the integrity of our electoral system.”

Those claims, however, fell apart after social media postings made by Van Orden (which have since been deleted) revealed he was indeed at the Capitol building complex with the mob. Those posts showed that Van Orden was present at a part of the complex that had been closed off to the public and that could only be accessed by someone who had crossed a police barricade.

According to reporting from The Daily Beast, Van Orden used campaign fundraising dollars in order to pay for his trip to the nation’s capital that week.

There is no evidence that he tried to enter the building. But the way in which Van Orden originally described his day on January 6, 2021, was clearly full of omissions, his critics said.

“Derrick Van Orden was not only part of a deadly attack on our Democracy by being on Capitol grounds while the riot erupted — he’s also lied to Wisconsinites and covered up his participation in the insurrection,” a spokesperson for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee spokesperson said at the time of those revelations.

In addition to his involvement at the Capitol, Van Orden also made headlines last year after he accosted a teen library worker over an LGBTQ book display at the Prairie du Chien Memorial Library. According to the worker he harangued, who was a minor at the time, the Republican candidate for Congress used “threatening” language, was “full-on shouting” at times during his tirade and demanded to know who set up the display so that he could “teach them a lesson.”

The library page told her parents that evening that she no longer felt safe working at the library after Van Orden confronted her.

“I was terrified that he would be outside, that there were be a collection of people outside waiting for me, waiting for anyone else,” she told The Associated Press.

Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn

Dear Truthout Community,

If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.

We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.

Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.

There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.

Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?

It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.

We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.

We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.

Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.

We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.

With love, rage, and solidarity,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy