This past weekend, President-elect Donald Trump suggested that his administration would seek to reclaim parts of Panama and wrest control of the entirety of Greenland.
During a Sunday rally in Arizona, Trump said that his administration would seek to regain control of the Panama Canal, wrongly claiming that the U.S. had “given” the canal to Panama, despite the fact that Panama’s control over the canal had been negotiated in a 50-year-old treaty.
“Has anyone ever heard of the Panama Canal? Because we’re being ripped off at the Panama Canal like we’re being ripped off everywhere else,” Trump said, adding that fees for ships to go through the canal “are ridiculous, highly unfair.”
The Panama Canal was created as an act of U.S. imperialism during the administration of President Theodore Roosevelt. After its construction in the early 1900s, the U.S. maintained political control of the “Canal Zone” in Panama until 1977, when a treaty between the two countries granted both equal control of the zone until 1999, when Panama took sole control over it. The treaty stipulated that Panama must remain neutral regarding who it allows to pass through the canal.
Fees have indeed risen in Panama in recent years. But although there’s no evidence that rising fees are directed at ships coming from the U.S. versus elsewhere, Trump baselessly suggested that Panama was ignoring the neutrality agreement due to Chinese influence.
“If the principles, both moral and legal, of this magnanimous gesture of giving are not followed, then we will demand that the Panama Canal be returned to us, in full, quickly and without question,” Trump said.
Panama President Jose Raul Mulino objected to Trump’s comments, resolutely stating that the Canal Zone would not be returned to the U.S.
“Every square meter of the Panama Canal and the surrounding area belongs to Panama and will continue belonging (to Panama),” Mulino said.
Trump’s imperialist sentiments on Sunday didn’t stop there — that same afternoon, the president-elect reiterated his insistence that the island of Greenland (which is officially under the realm of the Kingdom of Denmark, but has its own independent government) should be under the rule of the United States instead.
“For purposes of National Security and Freedom throughout the World, the United States of America feels that the ownership and control of Greenland is an absolute necessity,” Trump said in the announcement of his pick for ambassador to Denmark.
During his first term as president, Trump similarly expressed a desire for the U.S. to purchase Greenland, and also reportedly said that he wanted to trade Puerto Rico for Greenland. Although his staff later claimed that comment was a joke, a former aide to Trump said it was real and based on racist attitudes of the then-president.
“He actually said he wanted to see if we could sell Puerto Rico — could we swap Puerto Rico for Greenland because, in his words, Puerto Rico was ‘dirty’ and ‘the people were poor,'” former Department of Homeland Security (DHS) chief of staff Miles Taylor said in 2020.
Trump likely wants to purchase Greenland because he senses an economic opportunity there — one that would cause great environmental harm to the region. The melting of glacial ice on the island, due to the effects of the climate crisis, could open up the land to mining projects that large corporations can exploit, especially if Trump has control over approving those projects. Notably, Greenland is a largely autonomous and majority-Inuit country.
Greenland Prime Minister Múte Egede shot down Trump’s colonialist statements in comments on Monday.
“Greenland is ours. We are not for sale and will never be for sale,” Egede said. “We must not lose our long struggle for freedom.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.