Democratic lawmakers in Wisconsin pushed for a nonbinding referendum question on abortion to be included on the spring ballot this April, hoping that doing so would show anti-abortion Republicans, who control the state legislature, that residents of the state support the recognition and protection of abortion rights.
Following the U.S. Supreme Court ruling this past summer that dismantled nationwide abortion rights protections granted under the 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling, Wisconsin, like many other states, reverted back to an abortion law that was previously “on the books” but never removed or otherwise dealt with. For the Badger State, that meant going all the way back to a law that was passed in 1849, which forbids abortion at any stage of pregnancy past the legally ambiguous standard of “quickening,” and which makes no exceptions for rape or incest. An abortion can only occur within the state’s borders if a person’s life is dependent on it, according to the statute’s wording.
Wisconsin does not have the ballot initiative, a method of passing laws and amendments to state constitutions that other states allow residents to utilize. Leaders within the Republican-controlled state legislature have thus far made no moves to update the 1849 statute.
Instead, Republicans appear poised to push for more restrictions on allowing Wisconsinites to access public benefits. This month, GOP lawmakers proposed a nonbinding referendum that would ask voters whether there should be tighter work requirements in order to access those benefits.
Such referendums do not require the legislature to act on them, one way or another, depending on their outcome. Rather, they ostensibly serve to provide lawmakers with a better understanding of how voters feel about a particular issue. However, depending on the wording, a nonbinding referendum can be used for political reasons, too, potentially drawing one party’s base to the polls in an otherwise low-turnout election — like the yearly spring races, which this year features a contentious and important state Supreme Court election.
Democrats, responding to the proposal from Republicans, opined that it was being used as a political instrument and offered up a different proposal. Rather than voting on work requirements for public benefits — which Democrats say Republicans in the state have pushed for anyway over the past decade — they proposed eliminating that idea in favor of putting forward a nonbinding referendum on abortion instead, which would ask voters in the upcoming spring election whether the 1849 abortion law should be repealed, and whether “the constitutional rights guaranteed under Roe v. Wade [should] be restored.”
“Abortion care is health care and the people of Wisconsin will make that resoundingly clear given the opportunity to voice their preference in a statewide advisory referendum,” Senate Democratic Leader Melissa Agard said in a statement.
The referendum question from Republicans “attacks low-income Wisconsinites and is borne out of turnout considerations for their base in the upcoming spring election,” Agard added, noting that Republicans in Wisconsin have already imposed a number of work requirement restrictions in the recent past and in those instances, didn’t care about putting forward an advisory question prior to introducing legislation.
A question on abortion rights is more pertinent to Wisconsinites, Assistant Democratic Leader Sen. Jeff Smith said, given the outcome of the midterm elections — including a statewide gubernatorial race, which saw Gov. Tony Evers, a Democrat, win a second term in office by campaigning in large part on restoring abortion rights.
“Republicans lost [the gubernatorial election] last fall because they failed to take action on abortion,” Smith said in a statement. “They would rather play politics with superfluous referenda questions while women are left questioning why it has taken this long to have their healthcare rights restored. An advisory referendum to repeal the 1849 abortion ban is a bipartisan approach that will bring Wisconsin into the 21st century.”
Evers himself endorsed the idea of an advisory question on abortion in the upcoming spring election, set to be held in April.
“This is an opportunity to make clear that there continues to be not one single shred of doubt about where the people of Wisconsin are on this issue,” Evers said, noting that “Wisconsinites support Roe,” and “support reproductive freedom for our loved ones, our family members and kids, our friends, and our neighbors.”
Unfortunately for Democrats and for abortion rights activists in the state, Republicans rejected the nonbinding referendum proposal on abortion and pushed forward with their work requirements question, passing a resolution on Tuesday in the state Senate to include it on the spring ballot. It’s expected that the State Assembly will soon also pass the resolution, which was authored by Assembly Speaker Robin Vos (R) and Senate Majority Leader Devin LeMahieu (R).
Still, while the state ballot may not include the abortion question, a number of local governments in Wisconsin appear ready to allow residents in their jurisdictions to vote on it instead. On Tuesday night, the Eau Claire County Board of Supervisors voted to include a question on abortion on the spring ballot. Other counties, cities, towns and villages have the ability to include it on their ballots, too.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.