White House Chief of Staff John Kelly is counting the days until he finally can say goodbye to his job in the Trump administration, and that means President Donald Trump should be naming his replacement any day. Unfortunately for the President there appears to be only one enthusiastic contender, and that’s his son-in-law Jared Kushner.
We’ve already seen a number of potential candidates demurely turn down the President’s overtures when approached about taking over the high stress, low prestige assignment, with leading candidate Nick Ayers even going as far as to quit his own Chief of Staff role with Vice President Mike Pence and leave DC to avoid the job. Unlike others, Kushner is clamoring to be the next COS, and he’s not taking no for an answer.
“After the vice president’s Chief of Staff Nick Ayers turned down the offer to replace Kelly, the president’s son-in-law Jared Kushner — who is currently senior advisor to the president — is now a contender, according to CBS,” People reports. “Kushner, who is married to the president’s daughter and senior advisor Ivanka Trump, met with Trump on Wednesday to discuss the position, CBS reported.”
In some ways it would be an excellent fit. After all, one of the biggest concerns the next Chief of Staff would have is that the legal net is tightening around the President and whether his closest advisers would get caught in the crossfire. Kushner however, is already knee deep in all of the investigations of foreign influence in the White House and the 2016 election. From his participation in the infamous Trump tower meeting with Russian contacts prior to the election to new revelations that Kushner replaced Trump lawyer Michael Cohen as the liaison to the National Enquirer, which was accused of acting as a conduit for paying hush money to kill stories that could damage the then-presidential-candidate’s campaign run, Kushner is already as deep in the middle of trouble as his father in law.
If there is any doubt that Kushner really, really wants the job, you can just take a look at recent allegations that he may be torpedoing other potential candidates in order to boost his own chances. Take former New Jersey Governor Chris Christie, who was allegedly being considered for the Chief of Staff role until suddenly and abruptly he… wasn’t.
“Had Trump simply taunted Christie, once again, with the prospect of a White House job, only to jilt a former rival? Did the president’s resentful son-in-law use his family veto power to block the appointment of the man who humiliated his father?” asks Vanity Fair. “Perhaps it was the opposite: later Friday afternoon, The Washington Post’s Josh Dawsey reported that ‘people close to Christie’ were resentful that Trump ‘had toyed with him’ by passing him over for vice president and attorney general, and knocking him off the transition team. Multiple White House aides and advisers had told Dawsey that Christie was a front-runner for the job (‘POTUS was quite interested’) — right up until the moment that Christie declined. (There is also the small matter of Christie’s soon-to-be published memoir, which promises ‘frank appraisals’ of Trump associates, including Kushner.)”
At this point the likelihood of a Kushner promotion is so inevitable that even Republican lawmakers are resigned to it occurring. According to The Hill, Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) said during an appearance on Fox News that his “informed guess” was that Kushner will be the one to get the job. “I believe the president views this conflict period coming up with House Democrats as one where he needs loyalist people closest to him,” Gaetz said on Fox, The Hill reports. “I’ll go ahead and make that prediction, that Jared Kushner will be the next chief of staff.”
It’s no surprise that President Trump would choose loyalty over any other consideration for his next Chief of Staff. After all, you can’t successfully execute collusion without a circle of loyal yes men to help you out.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment. We are presently looking for 98 new monthly donors before midnight tonight.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy