The 2020 Democratic primaries are upon us now that Elizabeth Warren, Obama administration alum Julian Castro and Tulsi Gabbard have announced. And there are rumors that Kristen Gillibrand is also a likely contender, among others.
It looks like it’s going to be the year of the woman, but it’s also going to be a very different election than 2016 — especially because Democrats have made some changes to the way their run their primaries. Here’s what you need to know about those changes and how they might influence the shape of the election.
California, Texas and a number of other states are switching up their primary schedules, holding these elections much earlier in the year. This could dramatically change the game for candidates hoping to stick it out through the early stages of the primaries. Now they’ll need to spend more money on political advertising and make more trips to big-ticket states like California. And that means those states will play a more active role in selecting the 2020 Democratic ticket.
Speaking of schedules, the debate schedule is also being adjusted to accommodate what many suspect will be a very large field of Democratic candidates. There will be 12 primary debates, starting in June of this year. These debates will be broken into two blocks running back to back on different nights to give candidates an opportunity to be heard — and ensure voters don’t have to sit through a six-hour debate. Democrats will randomly select the candidates for each block, mixing it up each time.
They’ll also be cutting down on caucuses, an extremely undemocratic method of narrowing the candidate field. Switching to a primary will allow people to vote on their own schedules and in privacy, rather than in a room full of screaming people. Intimidation in the 2016 caucuses was a recurring theme.
And if you live in an open primary state, be warned: Some states are thinking about closing primaries in 2020 — so if you want to play a role in selecting the Democratic candidate, you should register as a Democrat sooner rather than later.
Similarly, candidates who want to run on the Democratic ticket are required to actually be Democrats in 2020.
While the much-hated superdelegates haven’t been eliminated for 2020, Democrats have chosen to put some checks on their power. They won’t be allowed to vote on the first ballot at the convention unless a candidate has received enough pledged delegates to take the nomination. They’ll continue to be able to assist with campaigns during the primary process, and their role as voters on later ballots at the convention could still prove extremely influential if there’s a close nomination fight.
Many of the reforms Democrats have instituted are designed to increase transparency and make the primary process, well, more democratic. Critics have long argued that the way both parties select candidates in the United States is one that tends to unfairly favor political power and influence, cutting some people out of the conversation before it even begins.
Republicans, meanwhile, are facing their worst nightmare: A growing likelihood that a sitting president will face multiple opponents of his own party in the primaries.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.