Skip to content Skip to footer

Watergate Prosecutor Says Trump Has “Zero Defense” in Georgia Inquiry

The investigation in Georgia could “send Trump to prison,” former federal prosecutor Nick Akerman said.

President Donald Trump leaves after speaking at a Make America Great Again rally at Ocala International Airport in Ocala, Florida, on October 16, 2020.

A former Watergate prosecutor says that former President Donald Trump has “zero defense” when it comes to an ongoing criminal inquiry in Georgia regarding the 2020 presidential contest.

Nick Akerman, who served on the Watergate prosecution team and as an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York, told MSNBC’s “The Katie Phang Show” that a phone call Trump made to Georgian election officials is most likely “going to send Donald Trump to prison.”

Trump and his lawyers phoned Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, the Secretary’s lawyer Ryan Germany, and other state officials in early January 2021. During the conversation, Trump pressed Raffensperger to decertify the election results in Georgia, citing unfounded and debunked claims of voter fraud.

Specifically in the call, Trump demanded Raffensperger “find 11,780 votes” to add to his vote total — the exact number needed to exceed Biden’s victory margin.

“So what are we going to do here, folks? I only need 11,000 votes,” Trump said on the call. “Fellas, I need 11,000 votes. Give me a break.”

Trump also made threats to the Raffensperger and Germany, telling them they could face legal repercussions if they refused to help him, and that they face “a big risk” by failing to find “illegally destroyed votes” for him.

According to Georgia state law, it is illegal to coerce, command, or otherwise try to get state election officials to engage in election fraud. The call from Trump to Georgia officials, which is currently under investigation by Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis, appears to be a clear violation of that statute, Akerman said.

During his interview on Sunday, Akerman acknowledged that Trump could feasibly defend himself by claiming there was “some ambiguity” on the recording of the conversation with Raffensperger and others. However, the defense wouldn’t be solid, and the comments made by Trump, in combination with evidence from the January 6 committee, could be enough to land an indictment for the former president.

“Once you look at what he said, trying to get Brad Raffensperger to come up with extra votes to make him a winner in Georgia, and put in the context about the January 6th committee has found, I think they have gotten a case beyond a reasonable doubt,” Akerman said.

Describing the Georgia statute as “really neat,” Akerman said that Trump “has violated” the felonious law, which carries with it a maximum penalty of three years in prison. The evidence in hand is hard to contradict, too, he said.

“Prosecutors love tape-recorded evidence because you cannot cross-examine it,” Akerman explained, adding that Trump “has zero defense in Georgia.”

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.