Skip to content Skip to footer

Watchdog: US Officials Swept Aside Aid Group Concerns in Gaza Aid Pier Planning

The report finds US officials decided against WFP’s requirement for the pier location after consulting Israeli forces.

U.S. Army Soldiers assigned to the 7th Transportation Brigade (Expeditionary), U.S. Navy Sailors assigned to Amphibious Construction Battalion 1, and Israel Defense Forces emplace the Trident Pier, May 16, 2024, on the Gaza coast.

The Biden administration swept aside objections about the harmful effects its military pier in Gaza would have on aid delivery efforts in the project’s planning stages, a damning new report from a government watchdog finds.

According to a report published Tuesday by the agency watchdog for the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), administration staff and the World Food Programme (WFP) raised a number of concerns about the pier, known as JLOTS — but were often overruled after U.S. officials consulted with Israeli forces.

This includes concerns raised by multiple USAID staff who said “the focus on using JLOTS would detract from the Agency’s advocacy to open land crossings in Israel and Egypt, which were seen as more efficient and proven avenues for delivering aid to Gaza.”

The pier was announced during Biden’s State of the Union speech in March and permanently disconnected months earlier than planned in July, due to weather issues that the report says were repeatedly raised in the planning process.

The report lends evidence to observations by many pro-Palestine advocates and experts that the pier merely served as a cynical PR ploy by a U.S. administration that is totally uninterested in alleviating the humanitarian disaster created by Israel.

This is evidenced by other findings from the report. Crucially, officials did not fulfill requirements for WFP, which was tasked with distributing the aid delivered via the pier, that the group said it needed to participate — suggesting that aid group participation in the aid pier wasn’t a top priority for officials.

In planning discussions, WFP said that the pier needed to be located in northern Gaza; the group needed safety guarantees, fearing for the safety of their workers; and that agencies in charge would be “transitioning the response to civilian operation after the initial 90 days of planned use.”

These conditions were not met. After consulting with the Israeli military and USAID, the U.S. Department of Defense decided instead to moor the pier in central Gaza, right at the end of Israel’s Netzarim Corridor. This is despite the fact that northern Gaza was experiencing the highest amount of food insecurity in the region and, by May, was in “full-blown famine,” WFP said.

Further, rather than security by a third-party group as WFP requested, officials decided that Israeli forces would provide “security” — despite the fact that Israel has an extremely hostile relationship with humanitarian aid workers and has killed hundreds of them amid its genocide.

These decisions would prove to be major contributors to the pier’s failure to provide aid. Ultimately, the pier was attached for roughly 20 of the 90 days expected, and delivered less than a third of the aid that the U.S. had promised — pallets of food that had sat on the beach in the sun for weeks.

Shortly after the pier was first erected, WFP announced it was pausing use of the pier because of safety concerns, citing Israeli shelling of WFP’s warehouses. This announcement came a day after Israel’s raid of Nuseirat refugee camp that killed 274 people, which Israeli forces staged using an area near the pier, according to photos and video.

This pause, according to the report, also came after crowds of hungry Palestinians had “improperly removed” aid from a dozen WFP trucks attempting to transport aid from the pier to their warehouse — after which Israel temporarily barred WFP from making deliveries and dragged their feet on approving more secure routes for WFP trucks to take.

Meanwhile, a USAID staffer said the relative safety of the aid routes was extremely volatile as “planned distribution routes could become evacuation zones within a matter of hours.”

Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn

Dear Truthout Community,

If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.

We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.

Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.

There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.

After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?

It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.

We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.

We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.

Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.

We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.

With love, rage, and solidarity,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy