A nonprofit government watchdog sent a complaint to the House of Representatives on Tuesday regarding Speaker of the House Kevin McCarthy’s (R) decision to share tens of thousands of hours of Capitol attack footage with Fox News host Tucker Carlson.
Critics of McCarthy’s decision to share the footage warned that Carlson would likely cherry-pick the videos to wrongly portray the January 6, 2021, attack as a peaceful protest.
On Monday, Carlson did just that, telling viewers of his show that the Trump loyalists who breached the Capitol were more like “sightseers” than “insurrectionists.”
“The footage does not show an insurrection or a riot in progress,” Carlson said. Notably, around 140 police officers were attacked by the mob and sustained injuries. Of the nearly 1,000 people who took part in the illegal breach of the building, 326 have been charged with assault, including 106 who face assault charges that involve use of a deadly or dangerous weapon.
Nonprofit government watchdog Public Citizen filed a complaint to the Office of Congressional Ethics on Tuesday.
“We request an investigation into the recent exclusive release by House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) to a single news outlet of confidential records obtained by the House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6 Attack on the United States Capitol,” the complaint from the organization said.
The letter was signed by Craig Holman and Lisa Gilbert, who serve as government affairs lobbyist and vice president of Public Citizen, respectively. It was also signed by two former White House ethics advisers — Norman Eisen, who worked in the Obama administration, and Richard Painter, who served under former President George W. Bush.
It was wrong for Speaker McCarthy to provide this footage to one organization that happens to be politically aligned with him and not release the videos to the media generally at the same time. This is not like granting an exclusive interview; this is providing a valuable government resource exclusively to one outlet and discriminating against others, which flies in the face of First Amendment values.
Public Citizen noted on its website that the release of the footage to Carlson was “the result of a political agreement between Rep. McCarthy, Tucker Carlson and others in McCarthy’s bid to become Speaker.”
Critics lambasted McCarthy’s decision to share the footage with Carlson, noting that the Fox News commentator has frequently downplayed the January 6 attack and pushed lies about it being a “false flag” event crafted by allies of President Joe Biden to make former President Donald Trump look bad. Former members of the January 6 committee also spoke out against the release of the footage, noting that it compromised the security of the Capitol building and could potentially be used to plan an attack in the future.
“It’s hard to overstate the potential security risks if this material were to be used irresponsibly,” Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Mississippi), former chair of the January 6 committee, said in mid-February.
Public Citizen echoed those concerns in a tweet announcing its decision to file a complaint to the House ethics office.
“Sharing Jan 6 footage exclusively to Tucker Carlson and his MAGA cronies just put everyone’s safety at risk in the Capitol,” the organization wrote.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.