Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Massachusetts) has sent a letter to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) urging the agency to investigate Google for potentially engaging in anti-competitive practices by manipulating and exerting wide control over the online advertising market.
In April, as part of another Texas antitrust case brought against the company, it was revealed that Google was running a covert operation to monitor online ad bids by other companies and using the information to bolster its own ad-buying program. “Project Bernanke,” which was not disclosed to bidders, evidently generated hundreds of millions of dollars a year for Google.
The Justice Department is probing Google over that project and other potentially anti-competitive online practices around advertising. But Warren says in her letter that she believes the CFTC, which regulates commodities and the derivatives market in the U.S., should conduct a broader scrutiny of the company.
“Today, the advertising market is functionally unregulated. It is a market worth hundreds of billions of dollars per year, and it is the main revenue driver for some of the country’s largest companies,” she writes. “The market for digital advertising has become perhaps the most actively traded commodity exchange in the world.”
Though the market is largely unregulated, Warren writes, “The market is subject to private regulation, however, by the dominant player in the market — Google. Google exercises that regulatory power to benefit itself and to exploit other market participants, both large and small.”
The senator then cites the 15 states and territories that are part of the lawsuit filed by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton following the original discovery of “Bernanke” to bolster her argument that Google exercises undue power over the online advertising market.
“Imagine if the financial markets are controlled by one monopoly company, say Goldman Sachs, and that company then owns the [New York Stock Exchange], which is the largest financial exchange, that then trades on that exchange to advantage itself, eliminate competition, and charge a monopoly tax on billions of daily transactions,” the states and territories wrote. “That is the world of online display advertising today.”
If these allegations are true, then they represent “deeply troublesome market manipulation” by Google, Warren says in her letter. The behavior is made especially concerning, Warren says, by the fact that the company doesn’t appear to be trying to hide their potentially anti-competitive practices.
“Given the power of a company like Google to unilaterally manipulate the online advertising market, it is critical that the CFTC ensures these new digital commodities are traded fairly and without harmful manipulation,” Warren concluded.
Online marketing is indeed largely unregulated, holding up a veil of secrecy to advertisers and their clients. This can cause undue harm, advocates have said for several years, to politics and the larger mission to fight disinformation online in general.
Warren’s letter is a continuation of a push from Washington, D.C. and other state and local governments to try to rein in tech companies. D.C. Attorney General Karl Racine filed an antitrust lawsuit in May against Amazon for artificially inflating prices and the Federal Trade Commission recently lost an antitrust case against Facebook.
Warren herself is also involved in several efforts to break up big tech companies. She has mounted an effort to break up huge companies like Facebook, Google and Amazon. Advocates argue, as Truthout’s Mike Ludwig reported last month, that the companies hold too much political and market power while largely going unregulated.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.