Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Massachusetts) is intensifying her scrutiny of federal financial regulators in the wake of the second- and third-largest bank failures in U.S. history, calling for an independent investigation into agencies that she says contributed to the collapses and saying that Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell especially deserves blame.
On Saturday, Warren called on the inspectors general of the Department of the Treasury, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and the Fed to conduct a “thorough, independent investigation” into the regulatory causes behind the collapses of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank. She says that, while the bank executives’ risky decision-making makes them culpable for their failures, they were only allowed to make those decisions in the first place because of lax regulatory oversight.
“Congress and President Trump weakened the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and allowed banks like SVB and Signature to evade key rules and regulations,” Warren wrote in letters to the officials. “The Federal Reserve under Chair Powell initiated key regulatory rollbacks. And the banks’ supervisors — particularly the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, which oversaw SVB — missed or ignored key signals about their impending failure.”
“These regulatory rollbacks created an environment in which failure was inevitable,” she continued. She says that an investigation is crucial for Congress to understand the weak areas to target in legislation to prevent future collapses, and urged the agencies to ensure that Powell does not interfere with the effort.
In an interview with MSNBC about the bank collapses on Sunday, Warren dug into Powell, saying that he “has failed” at his job as Fed chair.
“He has had two jobs. One is to deal with monetary policy. One is to deal with regulation. He has failed at both,” Warren said.
In response to a question on whether or not she would recommend that President Joe Biden replace Powell — originally a Donald Trump nominee — she said, “look, I don’t think he should be chairman of the Federal Reserve. I have said it as publicly as I know how to say it.” She further said on CBS on Sunday that Powell “took a flamethrower” to bank regulations when conservatives and Trump rolled back Dodd-Frank bank regulations in 2018.
As the lawmaker pointed out in her letter to officials, Powell doesn’t just bear responsibility for the bank failures — he has also personally intervened in preventing the public from knowing about the regulatory shortfalls.
As New York Times reporters uncovered on Friday, as federal officials prepared an announcement that it would be bailing out depositors at Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank last week, Powell blocked the inclusion of a phrase mentioning the regulatory failures in the statement by the Fed, Treasury and FDIC.
According to the report, Powell blocked its inclusion because he wanted the focus to be on the efforts to prevent widespread fallout from the failures — though progressive and Democratic lawmakers like Warren and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont) have argued that the real way to protect bank customers and prevent more collapses is to undo some of the deregulatory moves that Powell and conservatives have pushed through in recent years.
Progressive groups reacted with horror to the news of Powell’s move, echoing Warren’s message that Biden should not have renominated Powell.
“Jay Powell is an abomination, and everyone involved in Biden’s decision to renominate him must apologize,” wrote Revolving Door Project director Jeff Hauser on Twitter.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.