In wake of a stock trading scandal at the Federal Reserve, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Massachusetts) has called for an investigation into the agency’s officials to probe whether or not they were involved in insider trading.
Warren called on the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to look into reports that the Fed’s Vice Chair Richard Clarida moved between $1 million and $5 million in stocks on February 27, 2020, the day before Fed Chair Jerome Powell made a statement about potential policy change in response to the pandemic. Though the Fed is launching an internal review of Clarida’s actions, Warren said that the SEC should also be involved.
“The reports of this financial activity by Fed officials raise serious questions about possible conflicts of interest and reveal a disregard for the public trust,” Warren said in a scathing letter to the head of the SEC. “They also reflect atrocious judgement by these officials, and an attitude that personal profiteering is more important than the American people’s confidence in the Fed.”
She went on to say that the SEC, which regulates the stock market and securities industry, should have a special interest in the trade. “Most importantly from the perspective of the SEC, if these trades were based on Fed officials’ knowledge of non-public, market moving information, they may have represented potentially illegal activity,” Warren wrote.
The lawmaker asked SEC Chair Gary Gensler to investigate stock trading by all top Fed officials — not just Clarida — in order to discern whether insider trading took place.
“It is not clear why Chair Powell did not stop these activities, which corrode the trust and effectiveness of the Fed,” she wrote.
The past few months, Warren has advocated for a ban on officials trading stocks, a move she believes will combat corruption. Last month, she called on local Fed leaders to ban their staff from trading stocks — and earlier this year, she unveiled legislation that would ban federal officials and lawmakers, including members of Congress, from trading stocks altogether.
“It is a no-brainer,” she said at the time, adding that barring stock trades would help increase public confidence in federal institutions.
To Warren, the scandal is further evidence of the need for major changes in leadership at the Fed. On Tuesday, the Massachusetts lawmaker delivered a speech on the Senate floor criticizing the “culture of corruption” among Fed officials.
“The responsibility to safeguard the integrity of the Federal Reserve rests squarely with [Powell],” Warren said. “Setting the right culture at the Fed and making sure safeguards are in place to prevent self-dealing and to protect the public’s confidence should be the minimum standard any Federal Reserve chair should meet. And once there is a problem, a quick and aggressive response is critical. Chair Powell has failed at both tasks.”
Though Powell is up for potential renomination by the Biden administration, Warren is one of his staunchest opponents in Congress and has been campaigning against his renomination. On Tuesday, she described him as a “go along to get along leader who doesn’t know or doesn’t care when, on his watch, people with great responsibility advance their own interests over the interests of our nation,” adding that he has amassed “failures” as a leader.
Warren and progressives like Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-New York) have pointed out Powell’s previous regulation failures in the past. The Trump-era appointee has been weak on climate and has watered down post-recession bank regulation policies, they said, which poses risks to the financial stability of the country’s working class.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.