New polling indicates that, the more voters learn about J.D. Vance, Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump’s choice for vice president, the less likely they are to support him.
A Data for Progress poll conducted July 17-18 — days after Vance was announced as Trump’s running-mate — found that 3 in 10 voters said they hadn’t heard enough about the GOP senator from Ohio to form an opinion on him. The remainder of respondents were split in their opinions on Vance, with 35 percent saying they viewed him favorably and 35 percent saying they had an unfavorable opinion.
Although he’s a member of the U.S. Senate, Vance is a relative unknown even among voters of his own political party. But voters tend to sour on him quickly when presented with more information about his past statements.
The Data for Progress poll also asked voters to agree or disagree with a number of statements Vance has made in the past. Voters, for example, were asked whether they agreed with Vance’s statement declaring that the elimination of abortion “is first and foremost about protecting the unborn,” with only 39 percent agreeing with that idea and 53 percent disagreeing.
Vance is vehemently against abortion rights, although he tried his best to conceal his record from the public during his Republican National Convention speech last week.
“The [2020] election was stolen from Trump,” Vance once errantly claimed. Only 34 percent of voters — mostly conservatives and mostly Republican — agreed with that statement, with 56 percent disagreeing.
Respondents in the poll also disagreed with Vance’s false and xenophobic claim that the Biden administration was trying to “punish people” for not voting for the current president by opening up the border for migrants to easily pass through. Nearly 6 in 10 voters (58 percent) disagreed with that statement.
Voters also disagreed with Vance’s comment in defense of Trump’s stated goal of firing any government employee who is disloyal to him should he win the election later this year. “Trump should… fire every single mid-level bureaucrat, every civil servant in the administrative state,” Vance has said — 60 percent of respondents disagreed with this statement, the poll found.
Attacks against Vice President Kamala Harris, who is now the presumptive nominee for Democrats in the 2024 presidential race, were also rejected by voters. Vance described Harris years ago in disparaging terms due to her being childless, describing her as a “cat lady” who is “miserable.”
When asked if they backed Vance’s declaration that the country is being run “by a bunch of childless cat ladies who are miserable at their own lives” and who “want to make the rest of the country miserable too,” only 30 percent of voters agreed with Vance while 56 percent disagreed, the poll showed.
The Data for Progress poll is consistent with other surveys showing that many voters are still unsure about the GOP vice presidential nominee due to his lack of household name recognition. An Economist/YouGov poll, for instance — some of which was conducted before Vance was selected for the ticket — found that one in two voters (48 percent) said they didn’t know enough about him to say whether they had a favorable view. Among those who believed they did know enough, 31 percent said they had an unfavorable view while only 22 percent said they had a favorable one.
Vance and the Trump campaign are likely aware that his views will not help them politically — during his Wednesday night acceptance speech last week at the Republican National Convention, Vance didn’t discuss any of his far right beliefs on reproductive rights, even though he has said in the past that he supports a total national abortion ban. He also softened his Christian nationalist rhetoric, portraying himself as a mere Christian in support of religious liberty rather than a lawmaker who thinks that his religious beliefs should be codified.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment. We’re presently working to find 1500 new monthly donors to Truthout before the end of the year.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy