Palestine’s UN ambassador issued a strong rebuke of the high-powered UN Security Council (UNSC) for failing to stop the genocide in Gaza after the U.S. vetoed a ceasefire proposal for the fifth time on Wednesday, questioning whether the council has decided that it is acceptable to sacrifice Palestinian lives.
“There is no right to mass killing of civilians. There is no right to starve an entire civilian population. There is no right to forcibly displace a people. And there is no right to annexation. This is what Israel is doing in Gaza. These are its war objectives,” said Palestinian Ambassador Majed Bamya in an impassioned speech before the council.
On Wednesday, the U.S. used its power as one of five permanent members of the UNSC to veto a resolution that would have demanded a ceasefire, release of captives held by the Israeli military and Hamas, and a return of all Palestinians to their areas of Gaza.
After the vote, Bamya rebuked the council for allowing the genocide to continue, even as member states — including the U.S. — have condemned the civilian suffering in Gaza at the hands of Israeli forces.
“Two million people displaced. Still hunted, even when they are in tents. Total destruction of Gaza and all the requirements of life in it. And war on Lebanon, its people and its sovereignty,” Bamya said. “What does it mean to proclaim all these principles, ‘we reject, we reject, we reject,’ and then shield Israel of the consequences of its actions?”
“Maybe for some we have the wrong nationality, the wrong faith, the wrong skin color. But we are humans and we should be treated as such,” the ambassador went on. “Is there a UN charter for Israel that is different from the charter we all have? Tell us. Is there an international law for them, and an international law for us? Do they have the right to kill, and the only right we have is to die? What the hell does Israel need to do, more, for this council to act?”
Bamya said that there is “no justification whatsoever” for any state to veto a resolution to stop Israel’s slaughter. He pleaded, emotionally, for the council to simply recognize Palestinians as people, with humanity like anyone else.
“One day, someone will dig up the record of these meetings, the records of them — will see us pleading for the lives of our people over and over and over and over again. And they will try to understand why our calls were not heeded,” he said.
The U.S. bears special complicity in Israel’s genocide. The UNSC has seen five similar resolutions come to a vote, just for them to have been vetoed by the U.S. each time, despite the Biden administration’s previous insistence that they are working around the clock for the ceasefire.
Also on Wednesday, in the UN General Assembly, the U.S. was one of six states voting against a resolution affirming the rights of Palestinian refugees to their property and assets; and one of nine states to abstain on a resolution affirming the need for the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA) to continue its work without obstruction, with only three states voting against it.
Bamya said that the UN Security Council is not just obstructing a ceasefire, but also Palestinians’ right to live and have a future.
“There is a world where we could live and grow. And see our children grow with no occupation, no bombs, no tents, no settlements, no walls, no military checkpoints, no prisons. No constant humiliation, no oppression. No houses demolished, no amputations, no pain and no agony,” he said.
“That world can exist today if we were to act. And the fact we are not means that many, many more Palestinians will suffer,” Bamya went on. “It’s this future that is being destroyed before our very eyes. And the entire Palestinian civilian population is the primary victim.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.