Skip to content Skip to footer
|

Tweaked Email Privacy Act Headed Toward Committee Vote This Week

A loophole in an outdated law allows the government to read an individual’s stored email if it is more than 180 days old, using only a subpoena.

A loophole in an outdated law allows the government to read an individual's stored email if it is more than 180 days old, using only a subpoena. (Image: Jared Rodriguez / Truthout)

A House judiciary panel will attempt on Wednesday to pass new privacy measures to protect Americans’ email and digital communications from warrantless government spying.

With broad bipartisan support, including more than 300 co-sponsors, the Email Privacy Act is expected to pass committee, but with some last-minute changes to it made by Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.).

Late last week, Rep. Goodlatte proposed stripping out a provision that required the government to notify citizens after ten days that it had collected emails from their provider, The Hill reported. The measure does still allow for tech companies to notify customers about government obtained emails.

Although the watered-down transparency in Goodlatte’s amendment could tick off digital privacy cohorts, the underlying aim of the legislation remain intact, which is to close a loophole within the 1986 Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA). The outdated law allows the government to read an individual’s stored email if it is more than 180 days old, using only a subpoena. The Email Privacy Act would up that standard to a probable cause warrant.

Civil enforcement agencies like the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) have lobbied against the legislation, claiming it could hinder their investigations into civil misconduct. They’ve asked for exemptions that would allow them to seek certain kinds of stored digital records through a court-process that’s separate from warrant-seeking.

Lawmakers, however, have argued that all federal agencies must abide by the same constitutional restraints.

“We do not expect our private letters or photos stored at home to lose Fourth Amendment protection simply because they are more than six months old. Neither should our emails, texts, or other documents we store in the cloud,” Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) said during a hearing on the matter last September. He introduced companion legislation in the Senate known as the ECPA Amendment Act.

The Hill also reported that Rep. Goodlatte denied federal law enforcement requests to include language mandating tech companies hand over communications to the government in certain emergency situations without the need of a warrant. The Chairman’s amendment included no such special exceptions.

Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn

Dear Truthout Community,

If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.

We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.

Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.

There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.

After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?

It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.

We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.

We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.

Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.

We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.

With love, rage, and solidarity,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy