Skip to content Skip to footer

Trump Wants to Use Loophole to Install an Immigration Hawk at DHS

Even Republicans reject Trump’s illegal plan to install immigration hardliner Ken Cuccinelli as acting DHS head.

Acting Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Ken Cuccinelli leaves the lectern after speaking during a naturalization ceremony on July 2, 2019, in New York City.

The Trump administration wants to use an obscure loophole to install far-right immigration hawk Ken Cuccinelli as acting head of the Department of Homeland Security. But in a rare rejection of the president, even Republican lawmakers decried the plot as illegal on Wednesday.

Trump has been eyeing Cuccinelli, the acting director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, to take over DHS for weeks, but White House lawyers determined that it would be illegal to appoint him because he is ineligible under the Vacancies Act. Federal law states that acting department heads must either serve 90 days as a “first assistant” to the previous Senate-confirmed secretary or be confirmed to another position, making Cuccinelli, who was appointed as acting head of USCIS following the ouster of Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen, ineligible.

Trump has told allies that he wants to do an end-run around federal law and appoint Cuccinelli to DHS anyway, The New York Times reported on Tuesday.

Trump’s plan would involve using a loophole in which the president would tap Cuccinelli as assistant secretary of the Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction Office at DHS — currently a vacant position — and then promote him to acting secretary. Because the assistant secretary would be considered an “inferior officer,” the president can appoint anyone he wants without a Senate confirmation.

The move is under consideration because Cuccinelli is unlikely to be confirmed to the position, despite a Republican majority in the Senate.

Cuccinelli, a far-right conservative, previously supported primary challenges to incumbents like Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, who said earlier this year that he has a “lack of enthusiasm” about Cuccinelli being nominated to any permanent position.

Sen. Shelley Moore Capito, R-W.V., a staunch Trump ally, told Politico that Cuccinelli would have “difficulty being confirmed” to a permanent position and added that appointing him in an acting capacity would still be a “problem.”

A senior administration official acknowledged that Cuccinelli is “unprepared to run DHS and its vast array of missions” and many insiders worry that he would “transform it into an all-immigration, all-the-time Department, ignoring the other serious threats to the country.”

“We need somebody who knows the department really well. Somebody who understands the complexities. And the realities of the challenges of balancing all that has,” Capito told the outlet.

A senior administration official also added that McConnell would never allow Cuccinelli to be confirmed.

“If Ken was as liked by the White House as he thinks he is, he would’ve been nominated months ago,” the official said. “The problem for Ken is that he is a non-starter with Mitch McConnell and has a less than zero chance of being confirmed by the Senate.”

Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, the most senior Republican in the Senate, told Politico that Trump’s plan to go around the Senate was simply illegal.

“There’s some opposition to Senate confirmation. I have not heard anything about some go-around. But it’s my understanding that the existing law would not permit” Cuccinelli to be installed as acting head at DHS, Grassley told the outlet. “I don’t know how you get around that. I don’t think it’s possible because of what the law says, not because of anything else.”

Democrats also slammed the plan and questioned why Trump could not find a single person to fill the position who could legally run the department.

“If the White House cannot find anyone qualified and suitable to run the Department of Homeland Security — or even run it in an acting capacity — something is very wrong with this administration,” Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., the chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, told Politico.

Cuccinelli is a favorite of Trump, as well as of White House adviser Stephen Miller, an immigration hardliner who was reportedly responsible for the purge of top DHS officials like Nielsen earlier this year. Cuccinelli immediately made headlines after his appointment to USCIS when he declared that the poem on the Statue of Liberty welcoming immigrants only applied to “people from Europe.”

Cuccinelli was grilled by members of a House Oversight subcommittee over the administration’s immigration policies on Wednesday. At one point, Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, D-Fla., lit into Cuccinelli over the administration’s rhetoric.

“You and Mr. Trump don’t want anyone who looks or talks differently than Caucasian Americans to be allowed into this country,” she said.

“That’s false,” Cuccinelli replied.

“You want to block all immigration and make life harder for immigrants and you have demonstrated that you will pursue this heinous white supremacist ideology at all costs,” Schultz continued.

“I am not a white supremacist as you alluded,” Cuccinelli replied, “nor is the president.”

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.