Just after California Governor Gavin Newsom delivered a fiery inauguration speech that positioned the state firmly against the worst elements of the Trump administration, the president swiped back via his favorite medium: Twitter and empty threats.
Trump claimed that he told FEMA to “send no more money” to the state, which is recovering from the worst wildfires in its history; 2018 was a hot, dry, deadly and scorched year.
But the president’s hatred for California isn’t new. And, more broadly, conservatives make a point of regularly sniping at the state and “San Francisco values” — whatever that’s supposed to mean.
While California does tend to go Democratic in election years, it contains deeply conservative pockets. In a bitter twist, many of those rural California counties are also hardest hit by wildfires, thanks to quirks of geography. People who lost homes and loved ones in 2018 and during 2017′s terrible wildfire season may well have voted for Trump and counted themselves among his supporters — but now he’s willing to treat them as collateral damage in his war with the Golden State.
Trump has battled with California over wildfires for months now, trying to claim that the state’s forest management is responsible for its frequent and devastating fires. There are a few problems with that assertion — beginning with the fact that many fires start on federal land, which is not under state control. Wildfires also thrive in scrubland, not forests.
Newsom has made addressing wildfire risk a priority from day one — and that includes restoring gutted federal funds for, you guessed it, timber management.
Trump’s tweet — well, tweets, actually; he spelled “forest” as “forrest” the first time and had to redo it – appears to be the next salvo, and it’s a very troubling one.
As the country’s leader, Trump can theoretically direct a government agency to perform any number of tasks. So can Congress, which could insist on locking down funds to help California recover and invest in disaster preparedness. It should be noted that tax revenue from California contributes significantly to federal coffers, especially with the changes to the state and local tax deduction.
Trump seems to be suggesting that states not loyal to him cannot expect federal aid in the aftermath of disasters, which is truly repugnant. You shouldn’t have to sign a loyalty oath to get the support of the federal government, as this is what the federal government is for.
His remarks are also a violation of the collective agreement that is the United States. California, like other states, contributes taxes, goods and services to the union in the interest of the greater good. Not needing to maintain a standing army, for example, is a significant cost savings for California. Meanwhile, poorer states benefit from federal investments made with California dollars.
It makes sense to pool resources for activities that can be conducted on a federal level. Disaster response is one of those — and if Trump wants to punish California, which state will be in his sights next? Should all blue states fear that federal aid will be curtailed or withdrawn when the worst happens and they reach out for help?
And if the federal government cannot uphold its part of this relationship, why should California continue to contribute federal taxes, or remain in the union at all? I’m not advocating for secession or a tax strike here, to be clear, but Trump seems to believe he can threaten California without retribution — and he might be surprised by the outcome.
Join us in defending the truth before it’s too late
The future of independent journalism is uncertain, and the consequences of losing it are too grave to ignore. To ensure Truthout remains safe, strong, and free, we need to raise $24,000 by the end of today. Every dollar raised goes directly toward the costs of producing news you can trust.
Please give what you can — because by supporting us with a tax-deductible donation, you’re not just preserving a source of news, you’re helping to safeguard what’s left of our democracy.