In a tweet on Monday morning, President Donald Trump denied reports that he had ever suggested his likeness should be included alongside the four other presidents depicted on Mount Rushmore, but also said the idea was appealing to him.
A report from The New York Times this past weekend detailed several conversations between Trump and Gov. Kristi Noem (R-South Dakota) about Mount Rushmore over the past few years, including one in which the president described his “dream” to be on the monument.
“He said, ‘Kristi, come on over here. Shake my hand,’ and so I shook his hand,” Noem recounted. “And I said, ‘Mr. President, you should come to South Dakota sometime. We have Mount Rushmore.’ And he goes, ‘Do you know it’s my dream to have my face on Mount Rushmore?’”
“I started laughing. He wasn’t laughing, so he was totally serious,” Noem added.
Mount Rushmore sits on Indigenous lands that were stolen by the United States government.
In July of this year, according to the Times’s reporting, when Trump traveled to Mount Rushmore for July 4 celebrations, Noem greeted him in a private setting with an unusual presentation: a four-foot tall replica carving of the monument with his likeness included on it, according to a source with knowledge of the interaction.
The Times also reported that the White House had reached out to Noem about the possibility of adding Trump’s likeness to the mountain last year. According to the National Parks Service, there is no secure way to add a fifth face to the monument.
On Monday, Trump denied suggesting he should be on Mount Rushmore, but didn’t object to the idea.
“Never suggested it although, based on all of the many things accomplished during the first 3 1/2 years, perhaps more than any other Presidency, sounds like a good idea to me!” he wrote in a tweet.
However, in a campaign event in 2017, he told a crowd in Ohio that he wouldn’t ask them “whether or not you think I will someday be on Mount Rushmore” because the media would have criticized him for such remarks.
Many Indigenous groups and leaders spoke out this year when Trump made the trip to Mount Rushmore.
“The lands on which that mountain is carved and the lands he’s about to visit belong to the Great Sioux nation under a treaty signed in 1851 and the Fort Laramie Treaty of 1868 and I have to tell [Trump] he doesn’t have permission from its original sovereign owners to enter the territory at this time,” Julian Bear Runner, president of the Oglala Sioux Tribal Council, said at the time.
“President Trump’s Fourth of July visit to Mt. Rushmore is a continuation of Indigenous resilience and history being erased from national dialogues,” The Indigenous Environmental Network said in a statement prior to Trump’s arrival. “This spectacle is nothing more than a reminder that settler colonialism is alive and well.”
And while some Americans view Mount Rushmore as an inspirational monument, the Lakota “see the faces of the men who lied, cheated, and murdered innocent people whose only crime was living on the land they [U.S. presidents] wanted to steal,” Chairman of the Cheyenne River Sioux Nation Harold Frazier said.
Two separate treaties in the mid-1800s designated the area where Mount Rushmore is located as a reservation for the Sioux people, but after gold was discovered in the Black Hills, the federal government forced them to relinquish parts of the territory. In 1980, the United States Supreme Court ruled that the seizure of the land was illegal.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.